有声阅读与数字阅读、纸质阅读对照实验研究——阅读效果及认知负荷差异比较  

A Controlled Experimental Research on Audio Reading,Digital Reading and Paper Reading:Comparison of Reading Effect and Cognitive Load

作　　者：吴礼志[1] 洪星[1] Wu Lizhi;Hong Xing(Central China Normal University Library,Wuhan 430079)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学图书馆,武汉430079

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2024年第9期56-64,共9页Library and Information Service

基　　金：湖北省高校图工委科研基金项目“有声阅读与电子阅读、纸质阅读的比较研究”(项目编号:2020ZDX02)研究成果之一。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]比较有声阅读与数字阅读、纸质阅读在阅读效果及认知负荷上的差异,为不同场景下阅读方式的选择及阅读资源建设提供科学依据。[方法/过程]运用对照组实验方法,选取两种不同类型的阅读材料,借鉴PISA阅读理解测评框架编制问卷测试阅读效果,利用NASA-TLX量表对认知负荷进行测量。而后通过描述统计与混合模型方差分析对实验结果进行定量与定性分析。[结果/结论]有声阅读在简单记忆阅读效果上与数字阅读、纸质阅读没有显著差别,但在深层次阅读效果层面不如数字阅读和纸质阅读。有声阅读的体力负荷与受挫负荷显著高于纸质阅读,有声阅读的努力负荷显著高于数字阅读。据此提出不同阅读方式的适用场景。[Purpose/Significance]By comparing the reading effect and cognitive load in audio reading,digital reading and paper reading,this paper aims to provide a scientific support for the selection of reading methods in different scenarios and the construction of reading resources.[Method/Process]Through a controlled experiment,it selected two different types of reading materials.According to the PISA reading comprehension assessment framework,it designed a questionnaire to test reading effect,and used NASA-TLX scale to measure the cognitive load.Then,it took the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the experimental results through descriptive statistics and mixed model of variance.[Result/Conclusion]Audio reading is not significantly different from digital reading and paper reading in simple memory reading effect,but it is not as good as the two in deep level.The physical load and frustration load of audio reading are significantly higher than that of paper reading,and its effort load is significantly higher than that of digital reading.According to these,it proposes the applicable scenarios of different reading styles.

关 键 词：有声阅读 数字阅读 纸质阅读 阅读效果 

分 类 号：G252.17[文化科学—图书馆学]