从《怎么办》到《地下室手记》--对话理论中的“跨文本对话”与语言修辞  

From What Is To Be Done to Notes From The Underground:Cross-text Dialogue and Language Rhetoric in Dialogue Theory

作　　者：刘德飞 Liu Defei

机构地区：[1]安徽公安学院基础部,安徽合肥230031

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期74-79,154,共7页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“俄国《现代人》杂志研究(1836-1866)”(17AWW005)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：巴赫金的对话理论作为跨学科、跨专业的阐释话语已经得到学术界的广泛确证。但是,作为阐释话语的对话理论对语言符号社会性价值的强调易造成其与小说独立审美价值之间的紧张关系。事实上,小说文本中语言符号的社会和历史声音,不仅受到语言修辞的干扰,以致于作者无法将自己对社会和时代的思考彻底地灌注到小说的修辞体系之中,而且在小说修辞的涂抹和修饰下,作者原有的社会价值立场甚至发生了形变和意义增殖。Bakhtin's dialogue theory has been widely confirmed as an interdisciplinary and interprofessional interpretative discourse.However,the emphasis on the social value of linguistic symbols in dialogue theory as an interpretive discourse am easily cause tension between it and the independent aesthetic value of the novel.In fact,the social and historical voice of language symbols in the specific novel text is not only interfered by the novel rhetoric system,which makes the novel writer unable to thoroughly infuse his thinking on society and the times into the ecology of the novel rhetoric system,but also under the smearing and modification of the novel's rhetoric,the author's original social value position has even undergone deformation and meaning proliferation.

关 键 词：修辞体系 作者立场 对话 

分 类 号：I045[文学—文学理论]