检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王伯鲁[1] Wang Bolu
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学哲学院
出 处:《哲学研究》2024年第4期83-91,126,共10页Philosophical Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金(高校思政课研究专项)项目“马克思主义科技观的当代内涵及其教学应用研究”(编号20VSZ126)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:在预防为主理念的主导下,面向未来的科技伦理治理日渐受到社会各界的重视。科技研发及其成果推广应用活动的专业性、风险性、长衍生链条及多重负效应等特点,使其本身成为一个复杂的认识对象,人们普遍面临着认识迟滞、预测未来困难、检验或评价预测标准不匹配等一系列认识论难题,导致当今的科技发展陷入科林里奇困境。针对这一系列具体问题的分析和讨论,有助于说明认识论难题的由来、正视预测未来的困难、修正和补充预测检验标准、澄清科技伦理治理实践中的“瞄准”机制、夯实科技伦理治理的认识基础等,进而改善和提升面向未来的科技伦理治理成效。Under the guiding principle of"prevention first,"the ethical governance of science and technology,with an orientation towards the future,is gaining increasing attention across various sectors of society.The intrinsic complexity of technological research and development,along with its application activities,all of which involve professional skills,risks,extensive chains of consequences,and multiple negative effects,presents huge epistemological challenges.Tough issues such as cognitive lag,prediction difficulty,as well as discrepancy on evaluation criteria contribute to the Collingridge's dilemma in current scientific development.Analyzing and discussing these foundational issues can help elucidate the origins of the aforesaid epistemological challenges,address the difficulties in predicting the future,refine and supplement prediction-evaluation criteria,as well as clarify the"targeting"mechanism in practices of the ethical governance of science and technology.In this way,we shall consolidate the epistemological foundation,therewith enhancing the effectiveness of such a future-oriented ethical governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49