董仲舒在淮南王案审理中的影响——基于《史记》《汉书》的考辨  

Dong Zhongshu’s Influence on the Trial of the Huainan King Case:An Analysis Based on Shiji and Hanshu

作　　者：王泽春 WANG Zechun(Department of Philosophy,Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学哲学系,重庆401120

出　　处：《平顶山学院学报》2024年第3期63-68,共6页Journal of Pingdingshan University

基　　金：重庆市社会科学规划项目(2019BS018);西南政法大学资助项目(2019XZQN-13);重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目(23SKGH004)。

摘　　要：在没有亲自参与的情况下,董仲舒仍在淮南王案审理过程中产生了重要影响。虽然吕步舒担任主审官并不是出于其师董仲舒的推荐,但是汉武帝之所以任命他担任主审官,主要考虑到他是董仲舒的弟子,以期他能以董仲舒的思想审理淮南王案。事实证明,吕步舒确实以《春秋》决狱,其审判依据“君亲无将”受到董仲舒《春秋》公羊学的影响;反之,淮南王案的审理推动法律儒家化,基本奠定了后世以司法判决宣告谋反违法性的方向,且“君亲无将”原则逐渐成为认定谋反罪的法理依据,《唐律疏议》则将其正式写入法律条文。In the absence of personal participation,Dong Zhongshu still had an important influence on the trial process of Huainan King.Although Lv Bushu was not recommended by his teacher Dong Zhongshu as chief judge,Emperor Wu of Han appointed him as chief judge mainly because he was Dong Zhongshu’s disciple,hoping that he could try the Huainan king’s case with Dong Zhongshu’s ideas.The facts proved that Lv Bushu was indeed sentenced to prison based on the Spring and Autumn Annals,and his trial basis of no offense to the monarch and parents was influenced by Dong Zhongshu’s Gongyang theory of the Spring and Autumn Annals.On the contrary,the trial of Huainan King’s case promoted the Confucianization of law,which basically laid the direction for later generations to declare the illegality of conspiracy by judicial judgment,and the principle of no offense to the monarch and parents gradually became the legal basis for determining the crime of conspiracy,which was formally written into legal provisions in Tanglvshuyi.

关 键 词：董仲舒 吕步舒:淮南王案 《春秋》决狱 君亲无将 

分 类 号：B234[哲学宗教—中国哲学]