检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何雨珊 缪洪明 刘国祥 张立立 He Yushan;Miao Hongming;Liu Guoxiang;Zhang Lili(Vocational Education Center,Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China;Teaching and Research Section of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,School of Basic Medicine,Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China;University Office,Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China;Teaching and Research Section of Military Psychology,Department of Medical Psychology,Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China)
机构地区:[1]陆军军医大学职业教育中心,重庆400038 [2]陆军军医大学基础医学院生物化学与分子生物学教研室,重庆400038 [3]陆军军医大学校办,重庆400038 [4]陆军军医大学医学心理系军事心理学教研室,重庆400038
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2024年第4期533-538,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:陆军军医大学人文社科项目(2017XRW08, 2018XRW14);国家自然科学基金面上项目(81872028);陆军军医大学本科生培育项目(2019XBK03);陆军军医大学青年培育项目(2020XQN09)
摘 要:目的构建医学院校青年教师规范化培训考核指标体系,用于培训实践,提高培训质量。方法通过文献分析和小样本专家访谈初步确立考核指标体系,而后采用德尔菲法对40名熟悉医学院校青年教师规范化培训的专家进行咨询,并根据专家意见对考核指标体系修改后再咨询,直到所咨询专家意见基本一致。用层次分析法对各指标赋权。使用SPSS 17.0软件对数据进行分析处理。结果经过两轮专家咨询,35名专家对各指标的认同率达到90%以上,意见基本一致;各指标权重变异系数(W值)为0.00~0.15,集中程度较高。最终构建了一套青年教师规范化培训考核指标体系,包括4个一级指标、11个二级指标和35个三级指标。结论该考核指标体系为科学评价医学院校青年教师规范化培训效果提供了保障,通过发挥“以评促建、以评促导”作用,提高了医学院校青年教师规范化培训质效。Objective The establish a standardized training assessment indicator system for young teachers in medical colleges and universities,and to improve the quality of training.Methods A preliminary assessment indicator system was established through literature analysis and small-sample expert interviews,and then the Delphi method was used to conduct consultation with 40 experts familiar with the standardized training of young teachers in medical colleges and universities.The assessment indicator system was modified based on the opinions of the experts,and consultation was conducted again until basically consistent opinions were obtained from the experts.The analytic hierarchy process was used to assign weights to each indicator,and SPSS 17.0 was used for data analysis and processing.Results After two rounds of expert consultation,35 experts agreed with each indicator at a rate of more than 90%,and their opinions were basically consistent. The weight variation coefficient (W value) of each indicator ranged from 0.00 to 0.15,indicating a high degree of concentration. Finally, a standardized training assessment indicator system wasestablished for young teachers, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators, and 35third-level indicators. Conclusions This assessment indicator system provides a basis for scientificevaluation of the quality of standardized training for young teachers in medical colleges and universities andimproves the quality and efficiency of standardized training for young teachers by "promoting constructionthrough evaluation and promoting supervision through evaluation".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.209.242