“托幼一体”立法:规范表达、体例结构与立法权限配置——基于上海和台湾地区地方立法的比较与启示  

Integrated Legislation on Childcare and Early Childhood Care:Normative Expression,Structural Arrangements,and Legislative Power Allocation——Comparison and Enlightenment of Local Legislation in Shanghai and Taiwan

作　　者：马晶 杨天红[3] MA Jing;YANG Tian-hong(Institute for Education Law Co-constructed by Ministry of Education and Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;Law School of Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;School of Marxism,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学-教育部共建教育立法研究基地,重庆400715 [2]西南大学法学院,重庆400715 [3]重庆大学马克思主义学院,重庆400045

出　　处：《陕西学前师范学院学报》2024年第6期41-48,共8页Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University

基　　金：重庆市社科规划项目(2023NDQN09)。

摘　　要：法治化在各国或地区的托幼一体改革中发挥了重要作用。我国上海市和台湾地区分别于2022年和2011年制定了地方托幼一体法,以规范和引导辖区内托幼一体事业发展,保障公民权利。但因立法动因不同,两地立法在“托幼一体”的立法表达、“托幼一体法”的立法体例和法律文本呈现形式上存在较大差异。地方立法对全国立法具有试验和先导功能,分析上海和台湾地区托幼一体地方立法的差异,把握差异背后的法理与逻辑,可为全国托幼一体立法提供针对性建议。The rule of law has played an important role in the reform of integrating childcare and early childhood care in countries and regions.In 2022 and 2011,Shanghai and Taiwan respectively formulated local integrated childcare and early childhood care laws to regulate and guide the development of childcare and early childhood care integration within their jurisdiction,and to protect citizens’rights.However,due to different legislative motivations,there are significant differences in their legislative expression,legislative structure and presentation form.Local legislation has a pilot function for national legislation.Analyzing the differences between local legislation of Shanghai and Taiwan,and grasping the legal principle and logic behind the differences can provide targeted suggestions for the national legislation on integrated childcare and early childhood care.

关 键 词：托幼一体 法治 立法表达 立法体例 

分 类 号：G619[文化科学—学前教育学]