我国出版硕士专业学位论文选题及研究方法分析——基于混合研究方法  

Analysis of Themes and Methods of Master’s Degree Theses of Publishing in China:A Mixed Method Study

作　　者：余来辉 陈雨莲 Yu Laihui;Chen Yulian(School of Humanities and Communication,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou,520320;Great Bay Area Internet Communication and Governance Research Center,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou,520320)

机构地区：[1]广东财经大学人文与传播学院,广州510320 [2]广东财经大学粤港澳大湾区网络传播与治理研究中心,广州520320

出　　处：《出版科学》2024年第2期93-104,共12页Publishing Journal

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究项目“疫情常态化背景下城市低龄老年人数字阅读促进与优化研究”(22YJA860010)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：以2013—2020年703篇学位论文为考察对象,运用内容分析和半结构化访谈相结合的混合研究方法,对出版硕士专业学位论文选题和研究方法进行分析。研究发现:出版硕士专业学位论文形式比例失衡,联合指导比重偏低;应用性研究有余,基础性研究相对不足;理论基础比较薄弱,研究视角较为局限;研究方法呈现多元化趋势,规范性和创新性还有待提高。未来出版硕士专业学位论文应坚持多元考核与联合指导协同联动,理论研究与出版实践双向奔赴,研究方法规范与创新并重。Using 703 theses from 2013 to 2020 as research objects,and employing a mixed research method combining content analysis and semi—structured interviews,this study conducts an analysis of the topic selection and research methods in master’s these in publishing studies.The findings of this research reveal an imbalance in the distribution of thesis formats and a low proportion of joint guidance.Furthermore,there is an excess of applied research but insufficient foundational research.The theoretical foundation of these theses is relatively weak,and the research perspectives are often constrained within narrow boundaries.The research methods employed show a trend towards diversification,however,the standardization and innovation in these methods still need further improvement.In the future,it is recommended to adopt a multidimensional assessment and joint guidance.Both theoretical research and practical publishing initiatives should be pursued simultaneously,emphasizing both standardization and innovation in research methods.

关 键 词：出版专业硕士 学位论文选题 研究方法 出版学科 

分 类 号：G235[文化科学]