神话意象、数据与生命政治叙事  

Mythical Image,Data,and Narrative of Biopolitics

作　　者：杨庆峰[1,2] Yang Qingfeng(Institute of Technology Ethics for Human Future,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学科技伦理与人类未来研究院,上海200433 [2]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2024年第6期61-69,158,共10页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“当代新兴增强技术前沿的人文主义哲学研究”(20ZD&045);教育部社科重大攻关项目“数字化未来与数据伦理的哲学基础研究”(23JZD005)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：数智时代中生命政治叙事呈现了数据对于生命影响的双面性:强制与构建。要理解上述双重性,需要借助神话意象和理性范畴。普洛克路斯忒斯床铺意象和生命算法有助于理解强制叙事;超自然神意象与将技术道德化则有助于理解构建叙事。当然,要深入理解建构叙事还需放置在拉图尔—阿赫特豪斯—维贝克(LAV)理论中。从神话意象分析数据哲学及其伦理问题的思路拓宽了批判理论的根据,但是对于数据伦理如何发挥前瞻性效用却作用不大。Narratives of Biopolitics in the age of data-intelligence has expressed the duality:coercion and construction.To understand the duality,mythological images and rational categories have needed.The image“Procrustean Bed”and life algorithms help to understand coercive narratives.Supernatural god image and moralizing technology help to understand constructive narratives.The understanding of the constructive dimension can be situated in the context of the Latour-Achterhuis-Verbeek(LAV)theory.The foundation of the critical theory can be extended by the idea of analyzing data philosophy and its ethical issues in terms of mythical image,but it has a tiny effect on how data ethics can play a forward-looking role.

关 键 词：普洛克路斯忒斯床铺 数据 人性 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学] B82-057[哲学宗教—伦理学]