检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈佳 杨文宇 CHEN Jia;YANG Wen-yu(School of Marxism,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China)
出 处:《自然辩证法研究》2024年第4期75-80,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“建构主义STS的逻辑进路及其中国语境研究”(19BZX037)。
摘 要:“道德物化”是近年来技术伦理学研究的热点问题,体现了人们对技术内在伦理价值的新思考。然而,随着这一思考的深入,也引发了学界对“道德物化”自由问题的讨论。在“积极自由”与“消极自由”两种自由视角下,“道德物化”与自由存在着两难问题。通过对两种自由视角下“道德物化”自由问题的批判,提出了一种基于德性论反思“道德物化”自由问题的新视角。在德性论视域下,展现出“道德物化”对“人—技”共同体整体性、内在性的理解,揭示了“道德物化”中道德的情境性与社会性,呈现出“道德物化”对自由之实现的积极意义。“Materializing morality” is a attractive issue in the research of technological ethics in recent years, which reflects a new thinking on the intrinsic ethical value of technology. However, with the deepening of this thinking, it also triggered the academic discussion on the freedom problem of “materializing morality”. From the perspective of “positive freedom” and “negative freedom”, there is a dilemma between “materializing morality” and freedom. Through the criticism of the freedom issue of “materializing morality” from two perspectives of freedom, this paper puts forward a new perspective to reflect on the freedom issue of “materializing morality” based on the virtue theory. From the perspective of virtue theory, it shows the understanding of “materializing morality” to the integrity and immanence of the “human-technology” community, reveals the situational and social nature of morality in “materializing morality”, and shows the positive significance of “materializing morality” to the realization of freedom.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49