超越"族群政治"——元朝"根脚"逻辑揭探  

Transcending"Ethnic Politics":A Study on the Logic of Genjiao in the Yuan Dynasty

作　　者：罗玮 Luo Wei

机构地区：[1]中国历史研究院古代史研究所

出　　处：《历史研究》2024年第4期24-44,M0003,M0004,共23页Historical Research

基　　金：中国社会科学院青年人才"培远计划"资助项目阶段性成果。

摘　　要：40余年来的蒙元史研究,形成一套完整的"族群政治"解释框架,发展出"蒙汉二元"、"汉法与回回法"、"四等人制"等分析工具,推动研究取得重要进展。但其在某些领域的过度使用,遮蔽了元朝政治的另一项基本逻辑一一"根脚",产生一系列认识局限。"根脚"对"族群"的超越体现一定的"阶级性",将两者结合,可更全面客观理解元代历史。造成"族群政治"过度使用的深层原因之一,是对唯物史观尤其是阶级分析方法重视不够。推动唯物史观与中国史研究结合的再深化,正是新时代史学工作者的重要使命。Study of the history of Mongol-Yuan Dynasty during the past four decades has established an explanatory structure revolving around ethnic group politics,and developed analytical tools including the Mongol-Han Dichotomy,Han system and Huihui(Muslim)system,and the System of Four Ethnic Classes,all of which have contributed to important academic achievements.However,the overuse of these theories has obscured the basic logic of Genjiao(political background)in the study of Yuan Dynasty politics,and also imposed a series of academic limitations.In its transcendence of ethnic group,Genjiao reflects social class to some extent,and by combining the two concepts in research,a much more comprehensive and objective understanding of Yuan Dynasty history can be obtained.One reason for the past overuse of the concept of ethnic group politics is historians'insuficient emphasis of the materialist conception of history,especially class analysis.Thus,an important task remains for historians in the new era:the acceleration of a much more profound integration of historical materialism into the study of Chinese history.

关 键 词：元史 "根脚" 族群政治 唯物史观 阶级分析 

分 类 号：K247[历史地理—历史学]