检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈海懿[1] Chen Haiyi
出 处:《历史研究》2024年第4期131-150,M0006,共21页Historical Research
摘 要:"一·二八"事变爆发后,国民政府援引《国联盟约》第15条,实施九一八事变与与"一·二八"事变合并解决方针,是对日"一边抵抗,一边交涉"政策之表征。历经国联理事会、国联大会、十九人特别委员会等审议,国民政府未能实现两次事变合并解决设想,而日本通过外交行动拖延国联审议,将国联变成转移国际视线的外交平台。国民政府片面依赖第三方制衡策略开展国联外交,寄希望于国联遇制日本侵略的目标最终落空,折射出国民政府外交的固有缺陷。After the January 28th Incident,the Nanjing National Government invoked Article 15 of Convenant of the League of Nations and implemented the policy symbolic of its"Resisting while Negotiating"policy towards Japan which conflated the September 18th Incident and the January 28th Incident.After deliberations by the Council,the Assembly and the Special Committee,the National Government failed in its goal of combining and resolving the two incidents.Meanwhile Japan delayed the League of Nations deliberation via diplomatic actions,exploiting it instead as a diplomatic platform for the diversion of international attention.The National Government unilaterally relied on third-party balance strategies in its League of Nations diplomacy,but its plans to contain Japanese aggression via the League of Nations ultimately failed,reflecting the inherent shortcomings of its diplomacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.164.60