以审控辩关系为视角:再谈我国刑事庭审质证实质化路径之本土优化  

Fromthe Perspective of the Relationship among Trial,Prosecution and Defense:Further Discussion on the Local Optimization of the Substantive Path of Criminal Trial Cross examination in China

作　　者：张杰 ZHANG Jie(School of Law,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China)

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学法学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《遵义师范学院学报》2024年第3期43-48,共6页Journal of Zunyi Normal University

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目“新时代我国刑事庭审质证模式及本土化改革路径展望”(2020SJA1039)。

摘　　要：随着庭审质证实质化法理依据与制度规范层面磨合的不断深入,审控辩庭审质证关系呈现出各方依法独立、控辩双方既对抗又统一的新局面。然而,在实践中仍然存在庭审质证“走过场”现象,这极不利于庭审实质化司法改革的推进。因此,需要强化法官亲历且中立、控辩平等且对抗、辩方有效质证的要求,坚持“法官主持、控辩双方对抗性质证”的办案理念,遵循依法质证的规则,完善法官主持质证的相关规定、平衡控方庭审质证职权和有效落实辩方质证权利方面的意见与建议,以实现司法公正。With the continuous deepening of the substantive legal basis and institutional norms of cross examination in court,the relationship among trial,prosecution,and defense in court has presented a new situation where all parties are independent in accordance with the law,and the prosecution and defense sides are confrontational and unified.However,in practice,there still exists a phenomenon of“going through the motions”in court questioning,which is extremely detrimental to the promotion of substantive judicial reformin court trials.Therefore,it is necessary to strengthen the requirements of judges being experienced and neutral,equal and confrontational among prosecution and defense,and effective cross examination by the defense.We should adhere to the case handling philosophy of“judges presiding over,prosecution part and defense part opposing evidence”,follow the rules of legal cross examination,improve the relevant provisions of judges presiding over cross examination,balance the prosecution part’s power to cross examine in court,and effectively implement the defense part’s right to cross examination opinions and suggestions,in order to achieve judicial fairness.

关 键 词：质证实质化 法官中立 平等对抗 质证权 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]