形式如何成为媒介——重审伊格尔顿形式批评  

How Form has Become Media——Revisiting Terry Eagleton′s Form Criticism

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:曾勍 Zeng Qing(School of Literature,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China)

机构地区:[1]南开大学文学院,天津300071

出  处:《河北工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第2期41-47,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

摘  要:在《如何读诗》中,伊格尔顿提出以形式为中心的文学批评。在其视域下,形式既有足以搭建“对话空间”的丰富性,又有意义的可预想性。意义的可预想性也即效果的确定性,据此可以建立形式与媒介间的有机联系,以新视角重审形式范畴及形式批评。但这一新视角在伊格尔顿语境下尚显依据不足。因为文学文本在诉诸逻辑的同时,又以感知性经验为体验中心;并且,伊格尔顿以意义的社会建构性为论据,这一论据基于“文化史”的宏观视角,在文学文本的微观与内在层面并不充分,故此,有机联系在其语境下只能部分成立。为修正上述缺陷,必须结合“阐释学”以及“数字人文”等语境来对之作补充,从而提供从媒介视角来重审文学形式、重建形式批评传统的新可能。In the book How to Read a Poem,Terry Eagleton proposes a form-centered literary criticism.In his eyes,form can fully build up the“space for dialogue”and predict the meaning it carries.The predictability of meaning,that is,the certainty of effect,can disclose the organic connection between form and media,providing a new perspective in revisiting form and form-based literary criticism.However,this new possibility has insufficient foundations,since the literary context not only appeals to logic,but also stresses perceptual experience.Meanwhile,Terry Eagleton argues that meaning is constructed by society,which is based on“cultural history”.Thus,this kind of organic connection can only be established partially in Eagleton′s context.In order to revise Eagleton′s idea,“hermeneutics”and“digital humanities”will provide a new perspective to revisit form and rebuild form-based literary criticism.

关 键 词:伊格尔顿 《如何读诗》 形式 媒介 文学批评 

分 类 号:I024[文学—文学理论]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象