“孔子‘作’《春秋》”的汉唐推衍  

"Confucius Writing'the Spring and Autumn Annals"in the Han and Tang Dynasties

作　　者：闫春新 Yan Chunxin

机构地区：[1]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地山东师范大学齐鲁文化研究院 [2]孔子研究院

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2024年第2期95-106,共12页Chinese Culture Research

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“魏晋玄学统摄下的儒道佛经典互诠研究”(23BZX027);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“齐鲁文化传承发展与汉魏六朝政治文化格局研究”(22JJD770052)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：先秦“孔子‘作’《春秋》”的命题,多被汉唐接受、深化乃至过度蕴意及其治世功能的衍义,在两汉更是进一步衍生出极具神学意义的“孔子受命‘作’《春秋》”。汉唐这一推衍“孔子‘作’《春秋》”的内在发展理路,有其深刻的思想动因。汉唐“孔子‘作’《春秋》”的文化认定,其实是起因于最初的天命及圣言崇拜及其后两汉的孔子的渐次圣化与《春秋》渐次经典化甚至是“神化”。魏晋已至隋唐大都在接受圣化孔子为经学共识的基础上,有部分修正与引申。The proposition of"Confucius'writing'the Spring and Autumn Annals"in the pre-Qin period was mostly accepted,deepened,and even excessively imbued with meaning by the Han and Tang dynasties,and the derivation of its function of governance was further evolved into the highly theological concept of"Confucius being appointed to write it in the Han dynasty.The internal development path of this derivation has its profound ideological motivation.The cultural recognition of"Confucius‘writing'the Spring and Autumn Annals"during the Han and Tang dynasties was actually due to the initial worship of the Mandate of Heaven and Holy word,as well as the gradual sanctification of Confucius and the gradual canonization or even deification of the Spring and Autumn Annals.During the Wei and Jin dynasties,extending to the Sui and Tang dynasties,people accepted the sanctification of Confucius as a basis of the consensus of Confucian classics,and there were some modifications and extensions.

关 键 词：孔子 “作《春秋》” “受命‘作’《春秋》” 神化 圣化 

分 类 号：K2[历史地理—历史学] I26[历史地理—中国史]