检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛喆 Xue Zhe(Shanxi Tiandi Coal Mining Machinery Co.,Ltd.,Taiyuan 030032,China;China National Engineering Laboratory for Coal Mining Machinery,Taiyuan 030032,China)
机构地区:[1]山西天地煤机装备有限公司,太原030032 [2]煤矿采掘机械装备国家工程实验室,太原030032
出 处:《煤矿机械》2024年第7期53-57,共5页Coal Mine Machinery
基 金:中国煤炭科工集团太原研究院有限公司青年基金项目(F2022-ZD02)。
摘 要:针对矿用电动车辆电机、电控的热管理控制策略进行研究,通过驱动系统的换热关系,建立了冷却回路仿真模型,根据电机台架试验对仿真模型的参数进行匹配,并验证仿真平台的真实性和准确性。优选冷却液温度作为模型预测目标,冷却液流量和散热风量为被控对象,设计了车辆驱动总成的模型预测控制器(MPC),对比分析了温控效率和系统能耗在MPC、PID、开关量策略下的不同表现。结果表明,对比PID和开关量控制方法,MPC方法在高效控温的同时系统能耗量更小。Research was conducted on the thermal management control strategy for the electric motor and electronic control of mining electric vehicle.A cooling circuit simulation model was established based on the heat exchange relationship of the driving system.The parameters of the simulation model were matched based on motor bench tests,and the authenticity and accuracy of the simulation platform were verified.A model predictive controller(MPC)for the vehicle drive assembly was designed,with the optimal coolant temperature as the model prediction target and the coolant flow rate and heat dissipation airflow as the controlled objects.The different performances of temperature control efficiency and system energy consumption under MPC,PID,and switch strategy were compared and analyzed.The results show that compared with PID and switch control methods,the MPC method has lower system energy consumption while efficiently controlling temperature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7