检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青岛科技大学法学院 [2]山东省青岛市市北区人民检察院政治部
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第2期26-31,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:醉驾在我国入刑后,其定罪的标准经历了从单一定罪情节到多元定罪情节的转变,主要包括血液中酒精含量、隔夜醉酒驾驶、醉酒后短距离挪车等方面。但是,对于该罪的定罪情节,尚未形成全国一致的明确标准,不利于该罪的司法实践统一。本文提出,可以在遵循抽象危险犯判断的基本原则的前提下,统一该罪酒精含量、隔夜醉酒驾驶、醉酒挪车三项主要定罪情节的认定标准,以期统一该罪定罪情节的认定标准,发挥更好的社会治理效果。After drunk driving was criminalized in China,,the standard of conviction has undergone a change from a single conviction circumstance to multiple conviction circumstances,mainly including blood alcohol level,overnight drunk driving,and short-distance driving after being drunk.However,there is no clear standard for the conviction of this crime,which is not conducive to the uniformity of judicial practice of this crime.This paper proposes that under the premise of respecting the basic principles of the judgment of abstract dangerous offenders,the criteria for the determination of the three main convictions of the crime of alcohol content,overnight drunken driving,and drunken car moving can be unified,in order to unify the conviction of the crime.The criteria for the determination of the circumstances plays a better social governance effect of the crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222