病理学领域指南与共识的制订方法与思考  

Developing pathology guidelines and consensus:methods and considerations

作　　者：周奇[1] 陈耀龙[2] 梁智勇 Zhou Qi;Chen Yaolong;Liang Zhiyong(Evidence-Based Medicine Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;Department of Pathology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心,兰州730000 [2]中国医学科学院循证评价与指南研究创新单元、兰州大学基础医学院,兰州730000 [3]中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院北京协和医院病理科、国家病理质控中心,北京100730

出　　处：《中华病理学杂志》2024年第6期521-527,共7页Chinese Journal of Pathology

摘　　要：病理诊断在医学中扮演着至关重要的角色,制订和实施高质量的病理学指南和共识,可以促进提升疾病诊断的准确率,降低不必要的误诊和漏诊。因此,本文将围绕国内外病理学指南和共识的研究现状、高质量指南和共识的制订方法以及指南与共识的区别等主题展开论述,并在此基础上提出推动我国病理学指南和共识发展的思考与建议。Pathological diagnosis is vital in medicine.Developing and implementing high-quality pathology guidelines and consensus can enhance disease diagnosis accuracy and reduce unnecessary misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses.This article will cover the current status of pathology guidelines and consensus,methods for high-quality development,and the distinctions between them.Additionally,it will provide thoughts and suggestions for promoting their development in China.

关 键 词：指南 质量控制 病理学 共识 制订方法 

分 类 号：R36[医药卫生—病理学]