康德还是歌德?——从宗白华的不同选择看西方文论中国化的路径差异  

Kant or Goethe?-Exploring the Path Differences of Western Literary Theories'Sinicization Through Zong Baihua's Different Choices

作　　者：李勇[1] Li Yong

机构地区：[1]苏州大学文学院,江苏苏州215301

出　　处：《江西社会科学》2024年第4期69-79,F0002,207,共13页Jiangxi Social Sciences

摘　　要：从个人学术思想的构成方式、人生观和美学观念来看,宗白华明显亲近歌德而疏远康德,这种选择不仅仅是由宗白华个人的喜好决定的,而且是由中西文化差异造成的。中国文化以观物取象为基础的序秩理数思维与西方文化中数理逻辑思维之间的差异,导致康德的典型西方哲学在中国的接受困难,而歌德的人文体验式思想在中国得到广泛传播。中国学者对歌德的思想采用了兼容式接受路径,而对康德的思想采用了互补式接受路径。选择哪种接受路径取决于中国文论自身建设的需要,这种需要包括体现中国性、建构完整的话语体系以及能够解释包括中国文学在内的世界文学现象。为了建构具有全球视野的中国文论话语体系,无论是歌德式的文论还是康德式的文论,都应该通过不同的路径被接纳进中国文论中。From the perspective of the composition of personal academic thoughts,outlook on life and aesthetic concepts,Zong Baihua obviously favors Goethe over Kant,Which is Not Only a personal preference but also a result of Sino-Western cultural differences.This choice is not only determined by Zong Baihua's personal preferences,but also due to Sino-Western cultural differences.The difference between the sequential and rational thinking based on the observation of objects and images in Chinese culture and the mathematical and logical thinking in Western culture has led to difficulties in accepting Kant's typical Western philosophy in China,while Goethe's humanistic experiential thinking has been widely spread in China.Chinese scholars have adopted a compatible acceptance path towards Goethe's thought,while a complementary acceptance path towards Kant's thought.The choice of acceptance path depends on the needs of the construction of Chinese literary theory itself,which includes reflecting Chinese characteristics,constructing a complete discourse system and being able to explain world literary phenomena including Chinese literature.In order to construct a discourse system of Chinese literary theory with a global perspective,both Goethean and Kantian literary theories should be accepted into Chinese literary theory through different paths.

关 键 词：宗白华 歌德国 康德 西方文论中国化 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]