检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周嘉陵 颜杉 于露翔 王鹏 刘璐 谭发兵[1,2,3] ZHOU Jialing;YAN Shan;YU Luxiang;WANG Peng;LIU Lu;TAN Fabing(Department of Prosthodontics,Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400015,China;Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences,Chongqing 401147,China;Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education,Chongqing 401147,China;Chongqing Jingmei Denture Manufacturing Company Limited,Chongqing 400015,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属口腔医院修复科,重庆400015 [2]口腔疾病与生物医学重庆市重点实验室,重庆401147 [3]重庆市高校市级口腔生物医学工程重点实验室,重庆401147 [4]重庆晶美义齿制作有限公司,重庆400015
出 处:《中国医科大学学报》2024年第6期536-540,554,共6页Journal of China Medical University
基 金:重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目(2023MSXM094);重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项(cstc2020jscx-sbqwX0006)。
摘 要:目的评价不同构建角度和支撑密度对选区激光熔化钴铬(CoCr)合金卡环准确性的影响。方法3D软件构建一倒凹深度为0.50 mm的卡环样本数据(参考对象),将其导入金属3D打印机中,在不同构建角度(0°、45°和90°)和不同支撑密度(0.50、0.70、0.90和1.10 mm)条件下成型,得到CoCr合金卡环。采用模型扫描仪获取所有卡环的扫描数据(测试对象),在Geomagic软件中将测试对象与参考对象、测试对象与测试对象进行最佳拟合配准,获得卡环的准确性均方根误差(RMSE)值;采用单因素方差分析或非参数秩和检验对数据进行统计分析(α=0.05)。结果在正确度方面,支撑密度0.50 mm下,不同构建角度组按RMSE值排序为90°组>0°组>45°组;支撑密度0.70、0.90和1.10 mm下,不同构建角度组按RMSE值排序为45°组>90°组>0°组。在精密度方面,支撑密度0.50 mm下,不同构建角度组按RMSE值排序为90°组>0°组>45°组;支撑密度0.70 mm下,不同构建角度组按RMSE值排序为90°组>45°组>0°组;支撑密度0.90和1.10 mm下,不同构建角度组按RMSE值排序为45°组>90°组>0°组。结论不同构建角度和支撑密度对CoCr合金卡环准确性的影响不同。构建角度0°、支撑密度0.90 mm条件下卡环的准确性更高,值得临床和技工室推荐应用。Objective To evaluate the accuracy of selective laser melting of cobalt-chromium(CoCr)clasps with different build angles and support densities.Methods The 3D software constructed a sample clasp(reference object)with an undercut depth of 0.50 mm,which was then imported to a metal 3D printer to form CoCr clasps at different build angles(0°,45°,and 90°)and support densities(0.50,0.70,0.90,and 1.10 mm).A model scanner was used to obtain scans of all clasps(test objects);the test objects were aligned with the reference object and test subjects were aligned with each other through a best-fit alignment method using Geomagic software to obtain root mean square error(RMSE)values for the accuracy of the clasps.The data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or non-parametric rank sum test(α=0.05).Results In terms of trueness,the different build angle groups with support density of 0.50 mm were ranked by RMSE values as follows:90°group>0°group>45°group.For the different build angle groups with support densities of 0.70,0.90,and 1.10 mm,the RMSE values ranked as follows:45°group>90°group>0°group.In terms of precision,the different build angle groups with support density of 0.50 mm were ranked by RMSE values as follows:90°group>0°group>45°group.For support density of 0.70 mm,the ranking was 90°group>45°group>0°group,while for support densities of 0.90 and 1.10 mm,the ranking was 45°group>90°group>0°group.Conclusion The accuracy of CoCr clasps varies with the build angle and support density.However,clasps produced at a build angle of 0°and a support density of 0.90 mm exhibit higher accuracy and are recommended for use in clinical and technical laboratories.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.48.13