检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊超 乌萌 刘宗毅[1,2] 卢传芳 XIONG Chao;WU Meng;LIU Zongyi;LU Chuanfang(State Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering,Xi’an 710054,China;Xi’an Research Institute of Surveying and Mapping,Xi’an 710054,China;Xi’an Aerospace Remote Sensing Data Technology Co.Ltd.,Xi’an 710100,China)
机构地区:[1]地理信息工程国家重点实验室,西安710054 [2]西安测绘研究所,西安710054 [3]西安航天天绘数据技术有限公司,西安710100
出 处:《导航定位学报》2024年第2期155-166,共12页Journal of Navigation and Positioning
基 金:地理信息工程国家重点实验室研究课题(SKLGIE2022-ZZ-03)。
摘 要:针对激光雷达与相机标定精度会极大地影响定位初始化,融合定位算法对标定参数的准确性非常敏感,会严重降低融合定位算法的性能和可靠性等问题,提出一种激光雷达与相机联合标定分类方法:论述激光雷达与相机联合标定领域的最新的研究进展;重点分析和总结基于特征的标定方法、基于运动的标定方法、基于互信息的标定方法和基于深度学习的标定方法的突出研究成果;总结出4种标定方法的开源代码工具集,并对这4种标定方法的特点、标定精度和自动化程度进行分析比较;最后,展望激光雷达与相机联合标定研究的发展趋势。Aiming at the problems that the calibration accuracy of light detection and ranging(LiDAR)and camera can greatly affect fusion positioning initialization,and localization algorithms are very sensitive to the accuracy of calibration parameters,which may seriously reduce the performance and reliability of the localization algorithm,the paper proposed a classification method of combined calibration of LiDAR and camera:the latest developments in this field were discussed;and the highlight research achievements of feature-based method,the motion based method,the mutual information based method and deep learning based method were analyzed and summarized emphatically;then,the open source code tools of those four methods were listed,and their features,calibration accuracy and automation level were comparatively analyzed;finally,the future development trends of combined calibration of LiDAR and camera were concluded.
关 键 词:激光雷达(LiDAR) 相机 双目视觉 棋盘格 外参标定 联合标定
分 类 号:P228[天文地球—大地测量学与测量工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.48.161