检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任玲 张树贤 王坤 王璐 梁旭阳 左晨艳 张志梅 孙运良 吕胜祥 Ren Ling;Zhang Shuxian;Wang Kun;Wang Lu;Liang Xuyang;Zuo Chenyan;Zhang Zhimei;Sun Yunliang;LüShengxiang(Department of Gastroenterology,Lianyungang Hospital,Xuzhou Medical University(The Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University),Lianyungang,Jiangsu 222002,China)
机构地区:[1]徐州医科大学附属连云港医院(南京医科大学康达学院第一附属医院)消化内科,江苏连云港222002
出 处:《中国内镜杂志》2024年第6期30-36,共7页China Journal of Endoscopy
基 金:连云港高新区科技项目(No:ZD201929)。
摘 要:目的研究带线钛夹牵引技术在直肠乙状结肠巨大侧向发育型肿瘤(LST)内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)中的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2018年1月-2022年6月该院67例行ESD治疗的直径≥3 cm的直肠乙状结肠LST患者的临床资料。根据是否使用带线钛夹牵引,将患者分为A组(带线钛夹牵引组,n=32)和B组(传统ESD组,n=35)。比较两组患者病灶大小、切除总时间、黏膜下剥离时间、黏膜下剥离速率、黏膜下补充注射次数、病变整块切除率、完整切除率(R0切除率)、治愈性切除率和并发症发生率等。结果两组患者镜下形态均以颗粒型-结节混合型(LST-G-M)多见,术后病理均以绒毛状腺瘤为主。两组患者病变整块切除率、R0切除率和并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组病灶平均面积为(13.6±8.4)cm^(2),明显大于B组的(9.3±4.7)cm^(2),A组切除总时间为(42.3±10.3)min,明显短于B组的(47.9±10.1)min,A组黏膜下剥离时间为(30.7±8.2)min,明显短于B组的(36.1±7.6)min,A组黏膜下补充注射次数为(2.7±1.1)次,明显少于B组的(3.5±1.2)次,A组单位时间剥离速率为(0.4±0.2)cm^(2)/min,明显快于B组的(0.2±0.1)cm^(2)/min,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论带线钛夹牵引技术可为直肠乙状结肠巨大LST的ESD治疗提供更清晰的视野,且操作简单,能提高单位时间剥离速率,具有较好的临床应用价值。Objective To investigate the advantages and efficacy of traction with titanium clips in endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)for large laterally spreading tumor(LST)in rectum and sigmoid colon.Methods 67 patients with large sigmoid or rectal LST underwent ESD from January 2018 to June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively,including 32 patients in Group A and 35 patients in Group B.Group A was treated with clip-line traction and group B was treated with traditional ESD.The size of lesion,the total operation time,the submucosal dissection time,submucosal dissection rate,submucosal injection number,en bloc resection rate,R0 resection rate,curative resection rate and complications of the two groups were compared.Results LST-G-M was the most common type and villous adenoma was the main pathology in both groups.There were no differences in en bloc resection rate,R0 resection rate and incidence of complications between the two groups.The average size of group A was(13.6±8.4)cm^(2),significantly larger than that in group B(9.3±4.7)cm^(2),the total operation time was(42.3±10.3)min in group A,significantly shorter than that in group B(47.9±10.1)min,submucosal dissection time was(30.7±8.2)min in group A,significantly shorter than that in group B(36.1±7.6)min,submucosal injection number was(2.7±1.1)times in group A,significantly less than that in group B(3.5±1.2)times,submucosal dissection rate was(0.4±0.2)cm^(2)/min in group A,significantly faster than that in group B(0.2±0.1)cm^(2)/min,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with traditional ESD,clip-line traction can provide a better surgical field and more effective dissection for large LST in rectum and sigmoid colon.
关 键 词:侧向发育型肿瘤(LST) 直肠乙状结肠 内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD) 钛夹 牵引
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158