商业秘密侵权案件“接触加相同”举证规则之反思  

Reflections on the Testification Rule of “Contact+Similarity” in Trade Secret Infringement Cases

作　　者：杨雅妮[1] 郝慧耀 YANG Ya-ni;HAO Hui-yao(Law School,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou Gansu 730000,China)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学法学院,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期95-102,共8页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目“检察机关办理公益诉讼案件民行刑衔接机制研究”(21XFX015)。

摘　　要：“接触加相同”举证规则是基于商业秘密侵权行为的特殊性而对原、被告举证证明义务的一种新探索,目的在于减轻商业秘密权利人的举证负担。当前,该规则虽已为我国《反不正当竞争法》第32条所明确规定,但在适用过程中仍面临本质定位不清、判断标准不明、内部逻辑混乱及过分加重涉嫌侵权人举证负担等问题。为此,要正确适用“接触加相同”举证规则,应厘清其本质定位、明确其判断标准、理顺其内部关系,科学利用司法技术对“接触加相同”举证规则进行修正,以实现对原、被告双方程序利益与实体利益的平等保护。The testification rule of “contact+similarity” is a new exploration of plaintiffs' and defendants' obligations to provide evidence based on the particularity of trade secret infringements in order to lighten the trade secret obligee's burden of proof. At present, the rule, although clearly stipulated in article 32 of the anti-unfair competition law, still faces such problems as unclear orientation of nature, unclear judgment standard, confusing internal logic and excessive increase of the alleged infringer's burden of proof in the process of application. Therefore, to correctly apply the testification rule of “contact+similarity”, it is necessary to clarify its nature orientation, specify judgment standard, adjust internal relations, and scientifically use judicial technology to modify the testification rule of “contact+similarity” in order to achieve equal protection of both complainants and defendants' procedural interests and physical interests.

关 键 词：商业秘密侵权 “接触加相同” 举证责任 法律推定 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]