检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章永乐[1] Zhang Yongle
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《复印报刊资料(中国近代史)》2023年第5期3-18,共16页MODERN HISTORY OF CHINA
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“国际体系与国际法视野下的中国宪法变革路径研究”(18BFX032)阶段性成果。
摘 要:2011年以来围绕辛亥革命中的南北议和展开的跨学科学术讨论设置了新的研究议程,其研究成果,可以从三个方面加以审视:(1)《清帝退位诏书》历史意义的认定,关键在于如何对族群和治理方式高度多样的清王朝统治结构的脆弱性进行更为准确的历史定位;(2)在解释南北议和的过程与结果的时候,有必要进一步贯彻国际体系和内外互动的视角;(3)在分析南北议和的具体过程时,法学规范分析视角的引入丰富了既有的历史分析,然而只有呈现规范本身的历史性、多元性和冲突性,并且描绘出规范在政治实践语境中的具体运用的时候,研究者才能获得更为整全的历史图景。Since 2011,a series of interdisciplinary academic discussions on the North-South compromise in the 1911 Revolution have set new agendas for research.The new findings of the discussions may be assessed from three perspectives.First,when evaluating the historical significance of the Qing Emperor's Edict of Abdication,the key lies in understanding the fragility of the Qing Dynasty with its highly diverse ethnic composition and modes of rule.Second,when explaining the process and results of the North-South compromise,it is necessary to further implement the perspective of the interaction between the international system and domestic politics.Third,when analyzing the specific process of the North-South compromise,the introduction of the legal normative analysis has enriched the existing historical analysis,but without understanding the historical,pluralistic,and conflicting nature of the norms as well as the specific role played by the norms in the context of the political practice,it is difficult for researchers to obtain a comprehensive historical picture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.220.9