华兹华斯的潮汐农事诗学  

Wordsworth’s Tidal Georgic

作　　者：拉尔夫·皮特 韦清琦(译) Ralph Pite;Wei Qingqi

机构地区：[1]英国布里斯托尔大学 [2]东南大学外国语学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《鄱阳湖学刊》2024年第3期51-67,F0002,157,共19页Journal of Poyang Lake

摘　　要：由于农事诗常表现人类因自身需要而对原始自然进行干预、改变或开发,生态批评家往往对其评价不高,而对田园化倾向强烈的浪漫主义诗歌情有独钟。威廉·华兹华斯写于1798年的《丁登寺旁》便是生态批评家所赞美的田园诗的典范之作。然而至少在对该诗作的分析中发现,田园与农事之间或许存有更多的延续性和接壤地带,二者或能合为一体。不仅如此,《丁登寺旁》所蕴含的潮汐元素着力于表现人们面对潮去潮来的节奏时应如何栖居、如何响应、如何思索。该诗依循潮起潮落的节奏,以归来为起点,以在展望中离去为终结,诗的弧形运动轨迹因此具有了潮汐性质,这一形态在诗的终结时仍连绵不绝。欲走还留的意趣在诗的末段又得到了重申,其在开篇的回声延续着诗的周期性、潮汐性的模式。Ecocritics find the georgic less appealing as it interferes with,alters,or exploits a pristine nature for human ends.They instead prefer romantic poetry which manifests a strong tendency to pastoralize.While William Wordsworth’s 1798 poem‘Tintern Abbey’epitomises the pastoral that ecocriticism celebrates,in this case at least,there may be such greater continuity between the pastoral and the georgic that the two may be conjoined.Besides,‘Tintern Abbey’possesses qualities of the tides that inhabit,respond to,and reflect upon their oscillating movement.Since the poem ebbs and flows,beginning with a return and ending with departure in prospect,its arc is tidal,and this shape is extended beyond the poem’s ending.This sense of going back again is repeated in the poem’s closing lines,the echo of which in the opening continues the poem’s cyclical and tidal pattern.

关 键 词：华兹华斯 潮汐农事诗 田园诗 《丁登寺旁》 生态批评 

分 类 号：I561.072[文学—其他各国文学]