民事庭外作证方式的体系构造  

The System Structure of Civil Testimony Mode Outside the Court

作　　者：李峰 Li Feng(College of Philosophy,Law and Political Science,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院,上海200234

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2024年第4期145-154,共10页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2015年国家社会科学基金项目“民事证人庭外作证体系研究”(项目编号:15BFX068)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：民事庭外作证方式的扩张表现为两种基本模式:庭外作证方式多样化、庭外作证条件低阶化。由此使庭外作证手段呈现繁复多变的色彩。欲厘定具体庭外作证方式选择所应遵从的程序法理与规则,须准确透视复杂庭外作证现象下的体系构造。以单一基准衡量,各庭外作证方式与直接言词原则的距离呈现远近分层的静态构造;以双重基准衡量,直接言词原则与成本衡量决定各庭外作证方式分层呈现模糊性、相对性的动态构造。静态构造与动态构造均对庭外作证方式选择发挥规范与引导作用,法官在两种构造的价值取向之间保持平衡,保证庭外作证运用的妥当性与可接受性。The expansion of civil testimony mode outside the court is manifested in two basic ways:the diversification of civil testimony mode outside the court and low order of out-of-court testimony conditions,which make out-of-court testimony methods complex and varied.In order to determine the procedural jurisprudence and rules that should be followed in the choice of out-of-court testimony methods,it is necessary to accurately examine the system structure under the complex phenomenon of out-of-court testimony.Based on a single benchmark,the distance between each out-of-court testimony method and the principle of directness and verbalism presents a static structure of far and near stratification;Based on a dual benchmark,the principle of directness and verbalism and cost measurement determine the dynamic structure of the hierarchical presentation of each out-of-court testimony method,which presents ambiguity and relativity.Both static and dynamic structures play a normative and guiding role in the selection of out-of-court testimony methods.Judges maintain a balance between the value orientations of the two constructions,ensuring the appropriateness and acceptability of the use of out-of-court testimony.

关 键 词：庭外作证 静态构造 动态构造 价值平衡 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]