检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申现龙 张海江 SHEN Xianlong;ZHANG Haijiang
机构地区:[1]浙江大学建筑设计研究院有限公司,浙江杭州310005 [2]北京新桥技术发展有限公司,北京市100088
出 处:《城市道桥与防洪》2024年第6期101-105,共5页Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control
摘 要:针对大跨度斜拉桥在高烈度横向地震作用下的抗震分析,就现今工程中常用到的添加挡块、金属阻尼器、黏滞阻尼器这3种减震设计方法,以某特大跨铁路斜拉桥为工程背景,基于MIDASCivil建立了三维有限元动力弹性模型,分析了桥梁结构的动力特性;通过采用3种参数化后的方案与梁墩横向自由边界条件下的对比分析,研究了满足横向极限位移控制条件下,3种设计方案的结构地震响应特点;另外针对黏滞阻尼器和金属阻尼器减震方案,对2种阻尼器组合和布设方案进行了局部优化。研究结果表明:增设挡块减震方案要比采用阻尼器减震方案的墩塔底部内力大,采用黏滞阻尼器设计方案的减震效果最好;经过综合比较后,推荐采用组合1方案(过渡墩和辅助墩的左右侧分别设置金属阻尼器、液体黏滞阻尼器)用于铁路大跨斜拉桥。Aiming at the anti-seismic analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridge under the high-intensity lateral earthquake,three design methods of adding the baffle plate,metal damper and viscous dampers are commonly used in the current projects.Based on MIDAS Civil,a three-dimensional finite element dynamic elastic model is established to analyze the dynamic characteristics of the bridge structure.By comparing and analyzing the three parameterized schemes with the transverse free boundary conditions of the beam pier,the characteristics of the structural seismic response of the three design schemes under the control of the lateral ultimate displacement are studied.For the damping schemes of viscous damper and metal damper,the local optimization of the two damper combinations and layout schemes is carried out. The results show that the internal force at the bottom of pier pylon of damping scheme adding the baffle plate is larger than that of damper scheme. The damping effect of the viscous damper design scheme is the best. After the comprehensive comparison, the combination scheme 1 is recommended for the railway long-span cable-stayed bridge.
分 类 号:U442.55[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177