治道之间:任启运研礼倾向的演变——以《礼记章句》《经筵讲义》《礼记义疏》之《王制》《月令》为例  

Between the ways of governance:the evolution of Ren Qiyun’s tendency in ritual studies:the interpretations of Royal Regulations and Monthly Ordinances in Annotations on the Book of Rites,Lectures on the Classics,and Exegesis on the Book of Rites

作　　者：张露雨 ZHANG Luyu(College of Liberal Arts,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆师范大学文学院,重庆401331

出　　处：《江苏理工学院学报》2024年第3期9-17,共9页Journal of Jiangsu University of Technology

基　　金：2024年重庆市研究生科研创新项目“任启运礼学研究”(CYS240379)。

摘　　要：任启运《礼记章句》《经筵讲义》及《礼记义疏》的问世,伴随着个人身份的转变与研礼倾向的转移。康乾之际,任启运从乡塾学者到帝廷之师,再至礼学总裁,逐步被纳入清廷政统与道统的中心。三书不仅彰显了任启运在各阶段的身份认同,同时揭橥了任氏释礼重心由考据向义理的转向,以及经世意识的增强和文化认同感的提升。稽考三书阐释《王制》《月令》相关内容的异同,可管窥任启运礼学研究的核心精神与发展脉络。The advent of Ren Qiyun’s Annotations on the Book of Rites,Lectures on the Classics,and Exegesis on the Book of Riteswas accompanied by the change of personal identity and the shift of the tendency in ritual studies.During the Kangxi and Qianlong reigns,Ren Qiyun transitioned from a local scholar to an imperial tutor and eventually to the chief compiler of ritual studies,gradually integrating into the center of the political and Taoist system of the Qing Dynasty.The three books not only highlight Ren Qiyun’s evolving identity at each stage,but also reveal his shift from empirical research to philosophical interpretation in ritual studies,along with an increased awareness of practical governance and cultural identity.Examining the differences and similarities in the interpretations of Royal Regulations and Monthly Ordinancesacross the three books provides insights into the core spirit and developmental trajectory of Ren Qiyun’s ritual studies.

关 键 词：《礼记章句》 《经筵讲义》 《礼记义疏》 任启运 

分 类 号：B249[哲学宗教—中国哲学]