认罪认罚案件量刑建议制度的实践检讨与立法完善  

Practice Review and Legislative Improvement of the Sentencing Recommendation System in Plea Bargaining Cases

作　　者：闫召华 YAN Zhaohua(Research Center for Procedural Law and Judicial Reform,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学诉讼法与司法改革研究中心,重庆401120

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期92-102,共11页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“认罪认罚从宽制度实施问题研究”(19AFX009);重庆市教委人文社科研究项目“刑事诉讼法修改背景下值班律师制度研究”(19JD018)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：自认罪认罚从宽制度入法以来,认罪认罚案件量刑建议工作取得了显著成效,其规范化水平不断提高。但由于规则上的粗疏、理论研究上的不足以及其他实践因素的影响,导致在认罪认罚案件量刑建议的形成、提出、审查、采纳与调整等环节都暴露出诸多问题,在个别案件中甚至演化为尖锐的“检”“法”冲突,严重制约了认罪认罚案件的办理质效。为此,在《刑事诉讼法》新一轮的修改中,针对认罪认罚案件量刑建议,应在准确定位其性质与效力的基础上,健全形成机制,规范提出方式,明确载体,完善采纳和调整机制。Since the leniency system for plea bargaining cases was codified into law,significant pro-gress has been made in the work of sentencing recommendations for such cases,with the level of standardization continuously improving.However,due to inadequately formulated rules,insufficient theoretical research,and other practical factors,numerous issues have surfaced in the formation,pro-posal,review,adoption,and adjustment of sentencing recommendations in plea bargaining cases.In some instances,this has even escalated into sharp conflicts between prosecutors and judges,severely restricting the quality and efficiency of handling plea bargaining cases.Therefore,in the upcoming re-visions to the Criminal Procedure Law,the sentencing recommendations for plea bargaining cases should be accurately positioned in terms of their nature and effectiveness.This requires improving the formation mechanism,standardizing the proposal methods,clarifying the medium,and refining the a-doption and adjustment mechanisms.

关 键 词：量刑建议 认罪认罚从宽 刑事程序法治 立法完善 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]