考虑消费者风险规避的供应链退货运费险与定价策略  

Supply chain return freight insurance and pricing strategy considering consumer risk avoidance

作　　者：司凤山[1] 余真 王晶[1] SI Fengshan;YU Zhen;WANG Jing(School of Management Science and Engineering,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233030,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学管理科学与工程学院,安徽蚌埠233030

出　　处：《上海工程技术大学学报》2024年第2期223-230,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目资助(AHSKY2022D109)。

摘　　要：针对线上买卖双方的退货运费承担纠纷,电商平台引入退货运费险来分摊商品退货风险,但宽松的退货政策又增加了消费者的退货行为。为此,将第三方保险公司引入制造商主导和网络零售商跟随的斯坦克尔伯格博弈中,考虑风险规避型消费者的退货行为和运费险敏感性,建立多方决策主体共同参与的卖家运费险、买家运费险和运费险共同分担等3种定价退货模型,研究网络零售商的定价决策和运费险策略。结果表明:消费者的风险规避态度有助于降低商品售价和运费险价格,提高市场需求和企业利润;运费险共同分担机制能够有效缓解客户流失;退货率较低时,消费者的运费险偏好有利于供应链总利润的增长。In response to the return dispute between buyers and sellers in online transactions,e-commerce platforms have introduced return freight insurance to share the risk of product returns,but lenient return policies can also contribute to excessive returns.Thus,third-party insurance companies were incorporated into the Stackelberg game,which was dominated by the manufacturer and followed by the online retailer.Taking into account return behavior and freight insurance sensitivity of risk-averse consumers,three pricing return models with the participation of multiple decision makers,namely,the seller's freight insurance,the buyer's freight insurance and the shared freight insurance,were developed to analyze pricing decisions and freight insurance strategies of the online retailer.The results show that consumers’risk aversion attitudes benefit to reduce the product price and freight insurance price,thereby increase market demand and profits for all members involved.The co-sharing mechanism for freight insurance can be effective in mitigating customer loss,and when the return rate is low,consumer preferences for return freight insurance are advantageous for the profitability of the overall supply chain.

关 键 词：供应链管理 退货运费险 共同分担 风险规避 

分 类 号：F274[经济管理—企业管理]