检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪文文 王桂南 WANG Wen-wen;WANG Gui-nan(Department of Endodontics,Nanchang Vile Dental Hospital,Nanchang 330025,China)
机构地区:[1]南昌维乐口腔医院牙体牙髓科,南昌330025
出 处:《实用临床医学(江西)》2024年第3期73-75,共3页Practical Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的 探讨橡皮障隔离技术在根管治疗中的效果。方法 选取2020—2021年进行根管治疗患者224例的临床资料。其中2020年收治的103例患者(患牙114颗),采用棉卷隔湿方法(对照组);2021年收治的121例患者(患牙136颗),采用橡皮障隔离技术(研究组),比较2组疗效和患者满意度。结果 对照组根管治疗总有效率为54.39%,患者满意度为49.51%;研究组根管治疗总有效率为94.85%,患者满意度为95.04%。研究组根管治疗总有效率和患者满意度均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 橡皮障隔离技术能减少交叉感染,保证医患双方安全,提高根管治疗的成功率,减少并发症。Objective To explore the efficacy of rubber dam isolation for root canal treatment in dental patients.Methods Clinical data of 224 patients who underwent root canal treatment from 2020 to 2021 were selected:103 patients(114 affected teeth)admitted in 2020 were established as the control group,in which the cotton roll isolation was used;121 patients(136 affected teeth)admitted in 2021 were categorized as the study group,in which the rubber-barrier isolation was used;therapeutic efficacy and patient satisfaction were compared in the 2 groups.ResultsThe total effective rate of root canal treatment in the control group was 54.39%,and patient satisfaction was 49.51%;the total effective rate of root canal treatment in the study group was 94.85%,and patient satisfaction was 95.04%.The total effective rate of root canal treatment and patient satisfaction in the study group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The rubber dam isolation can reduce cross-infection and ensure the safety of both doctors and patients,improving the prospects of root canal treatment and causing less complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49