法律人工智能:检察改革的“阿里阿德涅线团”?  

Legal Artificial Intelligence:The"Ariadne Line"oof Procuratorial Reform?

作　　者：马国强[1] MA Guo-qiang

机构地区：[1]吉林大学公共卫生学院,长春130012

出　　处：《北方论丛》2024年第4期81-90,共10页The Northern Forum

基　　金：教育部高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“以中国实践为基础的法律体系理论研究”(17JJD820003)。

摘　　要：新一轮司法改革旨在建立以审判为中心的诉讼制度。为此,改革在公诉证据领域进行了一系列制度重构,以期衡平证据形式价值与实质价值、贯彻证据裁判原则。制度改造路径意期建立证据的外部监控机制以保障证据质量,然则这亦导致证据“事实确证”实质价值与形式价值难以衡平。法律人工智能由于具备高度形式理性,与改革目标具有同构性,被决策者寄予了作为“阿里阿德涅线团”、架设建立在司法主体上的内在辅助机制、重构证据制度结构、衡平证据的形式价值与实质价值的功能预期。但是,法律人工智能作为主体外的辅助机制,终究不能作为改革的治本之策,不然可能导致“伊卡洛斯之翼”式的悲剧。唯有从根本上提升司法人员的素质与意识,结合技术路径,才能造就改革真正的“阿里阿德涅线团”。The new round of judicial reform aims to establish a trial-centered litigation system.Therefore,the reform has carried out a series of system reconstruction in the field of public prosecution evidence,with a view to balancing the form and substantive value of evidence and implementing The principle of evidentiary adjudication.The path of system reform is intended to establish an external monitoring mechanism of evidence to ensure the quality of evidence.However,this also leads to the imbalance between the substantive value and the formal value of the"fact confirmation"of evidence.Due to its high degree of formal rationality and isomorphism with the reform goal,legal artificial intelligence is expected by decision makers to serve as an"Ariadne thread',build an internal auxiliary mechanism on the judicial subject,reconstruct the structure of evidence system,and balance the form and substantive value of evidence.However,as an auxiliary mechanism outside the main body,legal artificial intelligence can not be a permanent solution to reform after all,or it may lead to the tragedy of"Icarus Wings".Only by fundamentally improving the quality and consciousness of judicial personnel,combined with the technical path,can we create a real""Ariadne line"for reform.

关 键 词：人工智能 检察改革 证据裁判原则 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926.3[政治法律—法学]