新文化运动的另一路展开——陆侃如、冯沅君《中国诗史》与民国文史研究转型  

Another Path of the New Culture Movement:Lu Kanru and Feng Yuanjun's History of Chinese Poetry and the Transformation of Literary and Historical Research in the Republic of China

作　　者：成玮 Cheng Wei(School of International Chinese Studies,East China Normal University)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学国际汉语文化学院,上海市普陀区200062

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2024年第2期136-145,共10页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

基　　金：国家社科后期资助一般项目“晚清民国古典文学研究”[项目编号:21FZWB055]的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：陆侃如、冯沅君写作《中国诗史》,深受民国学术风气熏染。其书在文献考据层面,认夏代以前为不可知,全盘接受了胡适一派的疑古思潮。在诗史架构层面,则颇自出手眼:把“诗”的范围扩充至多数韵文,论证各时代主流体裁如何环环衍生,使得叙述更加系统化;以白话、文言迭相起伏贯穿全史,但不与体裁更替强行牵合,使得叙述更加弹性化。这两层面表现,均属新文化运动促成的文史研究转型之产物。前者当时已遭遇挑战,后者却代表着新文化立场介入文学史书写的另一方案,值得长久与之对话。Lu Kanru and Feng Yuanjun's History of Chinese Poetry was heavily influenced by the academic atmosphere of the Republic of China.Adopting a critical stance towards the veracity of ancient historical accounts,the authors aligned with Hu Shi's advocacies,presenting the pre-Xia dynasty era as an epoch veiled in obscurity.In terms of the structure of poetic history,it displayed great originality,for instance,by expanding the scope of“poetry”to include the majority of rhymed prose.In addition,the book elaborated on how the mainstream genres of each era evolved in succession,making the narrative more systematic.Their narrative,adeptly woven with both vernacular and classical Chinese,eschews conventional genre demarcations,introducing a versatility that reflects the transformative agenda of the New Culture Movement.These approaches placed the book as a representative of the transformation in literary and historical research prompted by the New Culture Movement.While their critical skepticism faced contemporary scrutiny,the innovative structural underpinnings of their work represent a significant,alternative discourse in literary historiography,meriting sustained academic engagement.

关 键 词：陆侃如 冯沅君 《中国诗史》 新文化运动 

分 类 号：I207.2[文学—中国文学]