检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖成佳 XIAO Cheng-jia(Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541004,China)
机构地区:[1]广西师范大学,广西桂林541004
出 处:《职业教育研究》2024年第7期77-85,共9页Vocational Education Research
基 金:广西教育科学“十四五”规划2023年度委托重点课题“‘双一流’背景下广西高等教育竞争力提升研究”(编号:2023AA07)。
摘 要:《家庭教育指导者专业标准》是家庭教育指导者专业培养、准入考核、发展培训的重要依据。由于实践情况与构建历程不同,中美专业标准在基本原则、内容框架和理论基础等方面都具有差异。中国基于专业伦理与道德、专业理念、专业知识和专业技能四个维度构建了家庭教育指导者专业标准的基本内容,美国则依据家庭生活教育内容构建了十个相关维度。研究认为,中国应考量家庭教育指导工作实际需要进行理论深化,进一步审思标准的基本原则与内容框架,并探索专业标准的实践途径。Professional Standards for Family Education Instructors is an important basis for the professional cultivation,admission assessment and development of family education instructors.Due to the different practice and construction process,there are differences in fundamental principle,content framework and theoretical basis between China and the United States.China has constructed the basic content of professional standards of family education instructors based on four dimensions of professional ethics and morality,professional ideas,professional knowledge and professional skills,while the United States has constructed ten related dimensions according to the content of family life education.The study suggests that China should consider the actual needs of family education guidance to deepen its theory,further consider the basic principle and content framework of standards,and explore the practical approaches of professional standards.
分 类 号:G710[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28