“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”资助期刊群体画像构建与分析——以领军期刊与重点期刊为例  

Construction and analysis of group portrait of journals funded by Excellence Action Plan for China STM Journals:A case study of leading and key journals

作　　者：潘飞[1,2] 孙文礼 王骁龙 彭湃 谈毅[1,2] 蔡云泽[1,2] PAN Fei;SUN Wenli;WANG Xiaolong;PENG Pai;TAN Yi;CAI Yunze(Journal Center,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200000,China;SJTU-De Gruyter Joint Lab,Shanghai 200000,China;School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学期刊中心,上海市200000 [2]上海交通大学-德古意特出版社联合实验室,上海市200000 [3]上海交通大学电子信息与电气工程学院,上海市200240

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2024年第6期831-840,共10页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

基　　金：中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会2023年研究课题“‘中国科技期刊卓越行动计划’资助期刊建设成效及办刊特色分析”(YJH202330);上海交通大学期刊中心2023年期刊发展研究基金项目“学术共同体视角下高校学术期刊育人功能实现与路径探析——以上海交通大学为例”(QK-B-2023004)。

摘　　要：[目的]构建“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”资助期刊群体画像,为定量识别、分析资助成效以及提出优化建议提供多维数据支持。[方法]构建定量指标,对“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”领军期刊及重点期刊群体的内容质量、传播质量、学术影响力、社会影响力、运营特点等进行静态与动态画像分析,并就期刊资助力度与期刊画像指标相关性进行探讨。[结果]“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”资助科技期刊内容质量、传播质量较高,学术影响力和社会影响力较强但个体差异较大。期刊内容质量、传播质量及学术影响力提升效果明显,开放获取程度与学术影响力提升效果存在相关性,项目资助对年发文量同比增长率、热点论文同比增长量、高被引论文同比增长量、金色开放获取论文同比增长率等指标贡献明显。[结论]资助政策对期刊建设产生积极效果,结合多维指标的期刊画像有助于展现资助成效。[Purposes]This paper aims to construct a group portrait of journals funded by the Excellence Action Plan for China STM Journals,providing multi-dimensional data support for quantitatively identifying and analyzing the effectiveness of funding,and proposing optimization suggestions.[Methods]We developed quantitative indicators to analyze the content quality,dissemination quality,academic influence,social influence,and operational characteristics of leading journals and key journals under the Excellence Action Plan for China STM Journals.We conducted static and dynamic portrait analysis and explored the correlation between journal funding and portrait indicators.[Findings]Journals funded by the Excellence Action Plan for China STM Journals exhibit high content quality and dissemination quality,and strong academic and social influence,but with significant individual variations.There is a noticeable enhancement in journal content quality,dissemination quality,and academic influence.The level of open access is correlated with academic influence improvement.The funding contributes significantly to indicators such as the year-on-year growth rate of published papers,hot topic papers,highly cited papers,and golden open access papers.[Conclusions]The funding policy has a positive impact on the construction of journals,and a multi-dimensional portrait of journals aids in showcasing the effectiveness of funding.

关 键 词：中国科技期刊卓越行动计划 科技期刊 群体画像 建设成效 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]