检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱红美 杨波[1] 刘玉彪 黄永久 ZHU Hong-mei;YANG Bo;LIU Yu-biao(Otorhinolaryngology Department,Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital,Taizhou 225300,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属泰州人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,225300
出 处:《中国实用医药》2024年第13期122-124,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的 研究雾化吸入治疗耳鼻喉科患者的效果。方法 88例耳鼻喉科患者,依据随机双盲的原则进行分组,分为对照组和观察组,每组44例。对照组患者予以常规药物治疗,观察组患者采用雾化吸入治疗。对比两组患者的临床治疗效果以及临床症状缓解时间。结果 经过不同的方案治疗后,观察组中治愈、显效、有效和无效患者例数分别为15、13、14、2例;对照组中治愈、显效、有效和无效患者例数分别为8、9、16、11例;观察组和对照组患者临床总有效率分别为95.45%(42/44)、75.00%(33/44),相比于对照组,观察组临床总有效率明显更高,组间差异明显(P<0.05)。观察组患者呼吸困难改善时间、咽部异物感缓解时间和声音沙哑缓解时间分别为(2.13±0.74)、(1.61±0.72)、(2.09±0.94)d,均明显短于对照组的(3.98±1.44)、(3.73±1.01)、(3.78±1.12)d,组间差异明显(P<0.05)。结论 雾化吸入治疗耳鼻喉科患者可以有效的缩短临床症状改善时间,提高临床效果,值得临床推广。Objective To study the effect of nebulization in the treatment of otorhinolaryngology patients.Methods 88 cases of otorhinolaryngology patients were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the principle of random double-blind,with 44 patients in each group.The patients in the control group were treated with conventional drugs,and the patients in the observation group were treated with nebulization.The clinical treatment effect and remission time of clinical symptoms of the two groups.Results After treatment with different programs,the number of cured,apparently effective,effective and ineffective patients in the observation group were 15,13,14 and 2 cases,and those in the control group were 8,9,16 and 11 cases.The total clinical effective rates of the observation group and the control group were 95.45%(42/44)and 75.00%(33/44).Compared with the control group,the total clinical effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher,and the difference between groups was significant(P<0.05).The improvement time of dyspnea,the remission time of pharyngeal foreign body sensation and the remission time of hoarseness in the observation group were(2.13±0.74),(1.61±0.72)and(2.09±0.94)d,which were significantly shorter than(3.98±1.44),(3.73±1.01)and(3.78±1.12)d in the control group,and the difference between groups was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Nebulization in the treatment of otorhinolaryngology patients can effectively shorten the improvement time of clinical symptoms and improve clinical effect,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
分 类 号:R76[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145