检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘思方 Sifang Liu(Institute of Law,Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences,Chengdu Sichuan)
机构地区:[1]四川省社会科学院法学所,四川成都
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第6期4038-4044,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
基 金:四川省社会科学院第七届学术新苗课题《生成式人工智能生成技术方案的可专利性及其权属研究》的阶段性成果。
摘 要:随着人工智能技术的迅速发展,人工智能在专利制度方面造成的挑战日益凸显。其中,关于人工智能生成技术方案是否适用于专利保护、如何确定发明人身份以及如何界定专利权人等问题备受业界学者关注。首先,人工智能生成技术方案有助于促进科学进步和社会发展,契合专利制度的立法目的,同时也符合专利制度的客体保护范围,在满足“三性”的前提下,属于可专利主题,具有可专利性;其次,人工智能的“非人属性”,使其不具有专利主体资格;最后,从专利制度精神和社会基础来看,将使用者作为人工智能生成技术方案的发明人、投资者作为其专利权人的权属安排符合现下科技和专利发展的需要。With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology,the challenges posed by artificial intelligence in the patent system are becoming increasingly prominent.Among them,questions regarding whether artificial intelligence-generated technological solutions are eligible for patent protection,how to determine inventorship,and how to define patent ownership have attracted widespread attention from scholars and industry professionals.Firstly,the technology solution generated by artificial intelligence contributes to scientific progress and social development,aligning with the legislative purpose of the patent system and falling within the scope of object protection.Given the premise of meeting the“three criteria,”it is a patentable subject and pos-sesses patentability.Secondly,the“non-human attribute”of artificial intelligence means it does not have the qualification of a patent subject.Lastly,considering the spirit of the patent system and societal foundations,the arrangement of attributing the user as the inventor of the technology solution generated by artificial intelligence and the investor as the patent holder meets the needs of current technological and patent development.
关 键 词:人工智能生成技术方案 可专利性 主体资格 权利归属
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.220.116