检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马丽娅 Liya Ma(School of Law,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学法政学院,浙江杭州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第6期4109-4113,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:《儿童权利公约》是国际人权条约体系的重要组成部分,明确了儿童作为权利主体的地位。我国自加入《儿童权利公约》后,将其转化为了一系列未成年人保护法律,以《未成年人保护法》为主。然而,《未成年人保护法》中对儿童的地位与《儿童权利公约》存在差距,通过分析《儿童权利公约》原则在《未成年人保护法》中的适用,才能进一步改善并缩小与《儿童权利公约》之间的差距,从而维护儿童的权利主体地位。The Convention on the Rights of the Child is an important part of the international human rights treaty system,which defines the status of children as subjects of rights.Since China joined the Convention,it has been transformed into a series of minor protection laws,mainly Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors.However,there is a gap between the status of children in Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors and the Convention.By analysing the application of the principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors,it is possible to further improve and narrow the gap with the Convention on the Rights of the Child,thus safeguarding the status of the child as a subject of rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49