检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戚昕蕊 梁军[3] QI Xinrui;LIANG Jun(National Cancer Center/National Cancer Clinical Medical Research Center/Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing,100021)
机构地区:[1]国家癌症中心,国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院,100021 [2]北京市普仁医院,100062 [3]中国医学科学院肿瘤医院深圳医院,518116
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2024年第7期1149-1154,共6页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的 回顾性分析食管癌穿孔患者预后的影响因素。方法 收集138例食管癌,经相关影像学检查、食管镜检查或术后病理检查确诊为食管癌性穿孔。采取Kaplan-Meier生存分析预后影响因素,采取倾向性得分匹配分析有无穿孔后续治疗(放疗、化疗、手术)、有无支架植入和(或)营养支持等对患者生存期的影响。结果 所有患者中位总生存期为6个月,单因素分析显示性别、放疗、肠内营养支持、治疗前有无深溃疡与总生存期相关(P均<0.05),多因素分析示女性生存优于男性,肠内营养的支持治疗可以改善生存。其余因素均对生存无明显影响。匹配分析显示,后续治疗、后续放疗、肠内外营养、单纯肠外营养、支架植入对生存期没有显著影响,仅单纯肠内营养取得生存获益(P<0.05)。结论 对于食管癌的癌性穿孔,中位生存期较短,穿孔后续针对原发灶的治疗(放疗、化疗、手术等)并不能延长患者生存。支架植入治疗不能改善生存。肠内营养对于该类患者至关重要。Objective To retrospectively analyze the prognostic factors of patients with esophageal cancer perforation.Methods 138 cases of esophageal cancer were collected and diagnosed with esophageal cancer perforation through relevant imaging examinations,esophagoscopy,or postoperative pathological examination.Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to assess prognostic factors,and propensity score matching analysis was used to assess the impact of subsequent treatments(radiotherapy,chemotherapy,surgery),stent implantation,and/or nutritional support on patient survival.Results The median overall survival of all patients was 6 months.Univariate analysis showed that gender,radiotherapy,enteral nutrition support,and the presence or absence of deep ulcer before treatment were related to the overall survival(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that the survival of women was better than that of men,and enteral nutrition support treatment could improve the survival.Other factors have no significant impact on survival.Matching analysis showed that subsequent treatment,radiotherapy,parenteral and parenteral nutrition,parenteral nutrition alone,and stent implantation did not affect survival of patients.Only parenteral nutrition alone achieved survival benefits(P<0.05).Conclusion For the cancerous perforation of esophageal cancer,the median survival is short,and the subsequent treatment(radiotherapy,chemotherapy,surgery,etc.)for the primary focus of perforation can not prolong the survival of patients.Stent implantation also cannot improve survival.Enteral nutrition is essential for these patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7