检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟文博 Meng Wenbo
机构地区:[1]山东大学(威海)文化传播学院,威海264299
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第4期146-156,216,217,共13页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基 金:山东大学(威海)2023年一流本科课程教研项目“现代文学经典赏析与评论实践”。
摘 要:南昌起义爆发前夕,郭沫若正随军北伐,任北伐军第二方面军政治部主任兼党代表,其时他已经扯起反蒋大旗,并对张发奎未能东征感到失望。待南昌起义爆发后,郭沫若第一时间要求参加。郭沫若提出的理由较有策略性,再加上张发奎一向有“倾向共产党”的态度,遂得成行。1927年8月3日,郭沫若从张发奎的部队中出发,与阳翰笙、梅龚彬、李一氓等赶赴南昌参加起义,途中历经波折。对于这段历程同行人员后来的回忆差异较大,目前各种研究文献对此事件的描述,矛盾与模糊之处也甚多。综合分析围绕这一历史事件的各种史料,可以看出“客观”复原历史的艰巨性和复杂性,但同时也能看到,事件“主角”的回忆比旁观者的回忆更加可靠,其中对历史细节回忆和描述最为详细的史料价值最高,自传式记述往往又比口述历史更可靠。On the eve of the outbreak of the Nanchang Uprising,Guo Moruo was on the Northern Expedition,serving as the Director of the Political Department and Party Representative of the Second Front Army of the Northern Expedition Army.At that time,he had already raised the anti-Chiang banner,and the Third Plenary Session of the Second Central Committee of the Kuomintang had also dismissed Chiang Kai-shek from the position of Chairman of the Central Military Commission of the Kuomintang.Guo Moruo hoped that the Wuhan government would continue to take action against Chiang,and launch an eastward expedition against Chiang,with Zhang Fakui s troops as the main force.However,he was ultimately disappointed.At this time,the news of the Nanchang Uprising made Guo Moruo feel unprecedentedly excited.He immediately requested to rush to Nanchang to participate in the uprising.Later,according to Zhang Fakui s recollection,Guo Moruo s request to go to Nanchang was very strategic.At the same time,Zhang Fakui maintained a good cooperative relationship with the Communists during the Northern Expedition with his pro-Communist attitude.Therefore,he also agreed with Guo Moruo s request to go to Nanchang.On August 3,1927,Guo Moruo set off from Zhang Fakui s army and rushed to Nanchang with Yang Hansheng,Mei Gongbin and Li Yimeng,among others.The specific process of their trip to Nanchang involved many historical details,and those who witnessed the event had many memories later.The differences between them were also significant,typical of how they crossed the Gan River after reaching the bank.Guo Moruo recalled that a“young man”who collected military power lines took over the river,while Yang Hansheng s recollection was that Guo Moruo called Nanchang at Tujiabu Station and asked He Long to send a boat to pick them up across the river.Li Yimeng recalled that they had thought of many ways to establish a relationship with Nanchang,and Nanchang only released a ferry to take them over the Gan River.After comprehensive analysis,Guo Moruo s reco
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.192.254