以质性为主的混合研究方法实践探索  

The Explore of Qualitatively Drive Mixed Methods

作　　者：朱逸 ZHU Yi(Science and Technology Department,Shanghai Jianqiao University;International Governance Research Center for Cyberspace,Fudan University)

机构地区：[1]上海建桥学院 [2]复旦大学网络空间国际治理研究基地

出　　处：《科学与社会》2024年第2期36-56,共21页Science and Society

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“增权理论视角下互联网‘零工群体’劳动权益保障研究”(23BSH057)。

摘　　要：传统混合研究方法发展至今,已形成多种方法类型与模式。关于其哲学预设、类型划分、方法选择,学界有不同看法。近年来,以质性为主的混合方法发展迅速。本文旨在探讨以质性方法为主的混合方法的实践可能及关键要点。研究运用案例与文献综合的研究方法,通过四个相关混合研究案例,从方法类型(单一类型-多重类型)、层次维度(纵向-横向)、切换频次(单次-多次)三个维度,推演出五类质性为主的混合方法类型,提出这些方法在实际运用中的关键要义,即方法集成的质量评价与适用性、储备与丰富质性方法工具箱、借鉴共识性标准及未来型塑可能。Traditional mixed research methods have developed and have formed various types and models of methods.There are different debates in the academic regarding their philosophical assumptions,type classification,and method selection.In recent years,mixed methods driven by quality have become increasingly common and common.This study attempts to explore the possible and key points of hybrid methods based on the above three dimensions,aiming to explore the practice of mixed methods mainly driven by quality.Based on four related mixed research case studies,five qualitative driven mixed method types are derived and proposed from three dimensions:method type(single type-multiple types),hierarchical dimension(vertical horizontal),and switching frequency(single multiple).The key points for the practical application of various methods are proposed,including the quality evaluation and applicability of method integration,the reserve and enrichment of qualitative method toolboxes,the reference of consensus standards,and the possibility of future molding.

关 键 词：质性为主 混合研究方法 哲学预设 方法类型 实践要义 

分 类 号：G40-03[文化科学—教育学原理]