论标准必要专利FRAND诉讼中禁诉令的谦抑性  

On the Modesty of Antisuit Injunction in Standard Essential Patent FRAND Litigation

作　　者：郑伦幸[1] 骆小春[2] ZHENG Lunxing;LUO Xiaochun(School of Intellectual Property,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210094,China;School of Law and Politics,Nanjing Technolony University,Nanjing 211816,China)

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏南京210094 [2]南京工业大学法政学院,江苏南京211816

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2024年第4期92-107,共16页Qilu Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“跨国标准必要专利FRAND许可法律问题研究”(21BFX200);江苏高校“青蓝工程”项目。

摘　　要：目前禁诉令颁发所采用的“前置化”思维,导致了跨国FRAND诉讼中的禁诉令冲突。这不仅增加了当事人纠纷解决的成本,还损害了国际礼让原则,引发了国家和地区之间的对抗与摩擦。禁诉令自身的制度逻辑决定了其应均衡国际礼让原则维护与限制,兼容司法能动主义与克制主义,保持足够的谦抑性,回归应对外国法院司法干涉的被动性与补充性地位。在规则上,应基于遵循国际礼让原则,促进FRAND许可交易达成,适应各国创制FRAND政策要求的优势,确立FRAND纠纷专利登记国专属管辖规则。在方法上,应摈弃“颁发前置化”思维以及抽象道德判断,以比例原则建构分析框架,分别对本国诉讼与外国诉讼的重合度、当事人之间的利益损害、国际礼让原则的影响进行评估与分析,权衡各方利益,以此作为禁诉令颁发的依据。The preemptive thinking issuing anti-suit injunctions has resulted in a conflict between them and transnational FRAND litigation.This has led to increased costs for the parties involved in dispute resolution and has damaged the principle of international comity.Furthermore,it has triggered countermeasures and frictions between countries and regions.The system logic of the anti-suit injunction itself determines that it should maintain a passive and complementary status in dealing with the judicial interference of foreign courts.The institutional logic of anti-suit injunctions dictates the need to balance the maintenance and limitation of international comity,accommodate judicial activism and restraint,maintain sufficient modesty,and revert to a passive and supplementary position in response to judicial interference from foreign courts.In terms of rules,adherence to the principle of international comity to facilitate the conclusion of FRAND licensing transactions,and adapt to the advantages and disadvantages of FRAND policy requirements in various countries.Finally,the establishment of exclusive jurisdiction rules for FRAND dispute patent registration countries is crucial.In terms of methodology,the preemptive thinking and abstract moral judgements are completely rejected.Instead,the principle of proportionality is employed to construct an analytical framework for assessing and analyzing the degree of overlap between domestic and foreign litigation,the damage to the interests of the parties,and the impact of the principle international comity.This enables the interests of all parties to be weighed in the balance,and this is used as the basis for the issuance of an injunction.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 禁诉令 谦抑性 国际礼让 比例原则 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]