检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王兆洲[1] 李嘉麟 温沛 WANG Zhaozhou;LI Jialin;WEN Pei(Department of General Surgery,Tanghe County People's Hospital,Nanyang 473400,China)
机构地区:[1]河南省唐河县人民医院普外科,河南南阳473400
出 处:《临床医学工程》2024年第7期773-774,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的比较腹腔镜根治术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果及术后并发症。方法选择2021年5月至2023年5月我院收治的结直肠癌患者90例,随机分为观察组(n=45)与对照组(n=45)。对照组行开腹手术,观察组行腹腔镜根治术。比较两组围术期指标及术后并发症。结果两组手术时间、术中标本切除长度、淋巴结清扫数量比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。观察组术后恢复时间、住院时间短于对照组,出血量、并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜根治术治疗结直肠癌的效果优于开腹手术,创伤较小,术后恢复较快,并发症较少,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare the clinical effects and postoperative complications between laparoscopic radical surgery and open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Methods 90 patients with colorectal cancer admitted to our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were randomly divided into observation group(n=45)and control group(n=45).The control group received open surgery,and the observation group received laparoscopic radical surgery.The perioperative indicators and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results No statistical difference was found in the surgical time,length of intraoperative specimen resection,and number of lymph node dissection between the two groups(P>0.05).The postoperative recovery time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,and the blood loss and incidence of complications were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions Laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer has better effect than open surgery,with less trauma,faster postoperative recovery,and fewer complications,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222