场域理论视角下同行评议公平信度提升路径研究  

The enhancement path of peer review fairness reliability from the perspective of field theory

作　　者：卢娜 孙劲楠 丁佐奇 郝海平[3] LU Na;SUN Jinnan;DING Zuoqi;HAO Haiping(School of Pharmacy,China Pharmaceutical University,211198,Nanjing,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]中国药科大学国际医药商学院 [2]中国药科大学《中国天然药物》期刊编辑部 [3]中国药科大学药学院,南京211198

出　　处：《编辑学报》2024年第3期253-259,共7页Acta Editologica

基　　金：中国药科大学高等药学教育科学规划重点课题“场域理论视角下的高校同行评议诚信建设研究”;科技期刊数字出版及全流程管理重点实验室课题(syskt2024-Z11)。

摘　　要：为了梳理和总结同行评议模式中的非公平性行为,在科研诚信视阈下为国内学术期刊和项目评审同行评议发展提供借鉴和参考。本文借鉴场域理论“场域”“资本”和“惯习”3个核心视角分析同行评议主体背后的实践逻辑,系统分析其产生机理并对提升路径的多维角度进行研究。在场域理论背景下,科研诚信视阈下同行评议公平信度缺失是场域关系危机、学术资本争夺、惯习形塑共同作用的结果。在此基础上,可以从建立场域良好的学术共同体合作关系、规避权力资源不当使用、改善形塑惯习的制度环境等方面对同行评议公平信度提升路径进行矫正与提升。In order to sort out and summarize the unfair behaviors in peer review mode,this paper provides reference for the development of peer review in domestic academic journals and project reviews from the perspective of scientific research integrity.This paper analyzes the practical logic behind the peer review subject from the three core perspectives of field theory,“field”,“capital”and“habitus”,systematically analyzes its generation mechanism and studies the multi⁃dimensional perspective of the promotion path.In the context of field theory,the lack of peer review fairness reliability under the perspective of research integrity is the result of field relationship crisis,academic capital competition and habitus shaping.On this basis,we can correct and improve the path of peer review fairness reliability from the aspects of establishing a good academic community cooperation relationship,avoiding improper use of power resources,and improving the institutional environment of shaping habits.

关 键 词：场域理论 同行评议 科研诚信 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]