初唐文士与文学仕进的演进  

Early Tang Dynasty Literati and the Evolution of Political Career Advance via Literature

作　　者：徐焕 Xu Huan(Institute of Literature,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院文学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第5期147-159,共13页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：中国社会科学院“青启计划”项目(2024QQJH016)。

摘　　要：初唐文士的政治、文学活动有力地推动了文学仕进的演进,从而影响有唐一代精英政治群体的构成与更替。首先,李世民、李泰集团相继以文学才名从事储争活动,这种政争形态引领了文学仕进的特殊宦路。其次,以贵戚朝官为中心的文学社群寄托着京中文士的仕进期待,其复杂面相折射出朝官内部对国家人事政策的异见冲突。最后,文权更迭的运行机制表现为文学与仕进的双向联动,两者的兼容互成是文学仕进的理想境界。从储位之争到后位之争乃至武周革命,初唐频繁政争的背后潜藏着文士与勋旧争权仕进的持久斗争,双方矛盾的激化导致文士阶层的政治跃升,这不仅开拓了文学仕进的空间,更为唐代的文学繁荣和文化转型奠定了基石。The political and literary activities of the early Tang Dynasty literati contributed to the evolution of political career advance via literature,which in turn influenced the composition and turnover of the elite political groups of the Tang dynasty.Firstly,Li Shimin's group and Li Tai's group were engaged in the activities of the crown prince's disputes in the name of literary talent,and those political disputes led to a special road of political career advance via literature.Both groups carried out their political struggles under the cover of their literary fame,which ultimately led to the different fates of the members.Due to the defeat of Li Tai's group,its members were caught in a severe political crisis,which led to anxiety about the literati identity,and the value of literature that they boasted was self-deconstructed.Secondly,the literary community centered on the noble relatives and court officials held the expectations of literary scholars in the capital for career advancement,and its complex facets reflected the conflicting views of the courtiers on the state's personnel policies.Li Shimin and Li Tai attached importance to literature,which aroused the literati's political enthusiasm.The literary community of Yang Shidao's Banquet showed the double face of “colleague” and “clique” in the relationship,and expressed the contradictory mentality of “advancement” and “seclusion”.The core of the conflict between the two sides was not only about their own political situation,but also reflected their political ambiguity over human resources.Thirdly,the operation mechanism of the transfer of literary power manifested itself as a two-way linkage between literature and career advancement,and the compatibility of the two gradually became the ideal situation for the literati.In the context of the revival of Confucianism in the early Tang Dynasty,the value of literature was often deconstructed and stigmatized,while the dynasty's high-ranking officials were divided by the struggle for discourse power.As

关 键 词：初唐 文士 文学仕进 文学社群 文学权力 

分 类 号：K242.1[历史地理—历史学] I206.2[历史地理—中国史]