《周易参同契》阴注、容注成书于唐代新证  

New Evidences on the Viewpoint That Yin Changsheng's and Rong's Annotations to Cantong qi Were Written in the Tang Dynasty

作　　者：屈燕飞 QU Yan-fei

机构地区：[1]台州学院人文学院,浙江临海637000

出　　处：《周易研究》2024年第3期15-25,共11页Studies of Zhouyi

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:“唐宋《周易参同契》注本文献新考”(19XJC740004)。

摘　　要：学界普遍认为《周易参同契》阴注、容注成书于唐代,但这一结论仍有进一步论证的必要与空间。阴注引用了活动于唐太宗至高宗时期的李淳风的《乙巳占》,而为唐玄宗时期刘知古的《日月玄枢篇》所引用,因此阴注很可能诞生于唐高宗至武则天执政期间。容注的成书推测时间跨度比较大。容注引用了唐玄宗《道德真经御注》,又为唐末《通幽诀》所引,表明容注的成书时间比阴注晚,很可能在中唐。另外,阴注、容注所依据的《参同契》底本与其他现存注本底本存在明显差异。这种差异不仅体现在注本底本之间,也体现在历代《参同契》引文与《参同契》各注本底本的差别上。阴本、容本与后世成为主流的彭本、朱本分属两个不同的文本系统,因此阴注和容注很可能是《参同契》的早期注本。南宋之前,以阴本、容本为代表的文本系统占据主导地位;南宋之后,以彭本、朱本为代表的文本系统占有绝对优势,阴本、容本系统的影响力则大幅下降。Scholars generally believe that the annotation of Rong(the last name is lost)and annotation of Yin Changsheng to the Zhouyi cantong qi(Token for the Agreement of the Three According to the Zhou Changes)were written in the Tang dynasty(618-907),but further argumentation is still needed for this conclusion.Yin Changsheng's annotation quotes Li Chunfeng's(602-670)Yisi zhan(a divination method using the 2nd heavenly stem and the 4th lunar month)which was used from the period of Emperor Taizong(r.626-649)to Emperor Gaozong(r.649-683)of the Tang dynasty,while Liu Zhigu from the period of Emperor Xuanzong(r.712-756)of the Tang dynasty cited Yin's annotations in his Riyue xuan shu pian(Mysterious Pivot of Sun and Moon).It can be inferred that Yin's annotation was likely written during the reign of Emperor Gaozong to Empress Wu Zetian(r.690-705).The time span of the composition of Rong's annotation is relatively large.However,it can be inferred from the reference to Rong quotation from Tang Xuanzong's Annotation of the Classic of the Virtue of the Dao and Tongyou Jue's quotation from Rong's annotation,the writing time of Rong's annotation is latter than Yin Changsheng's,possibly in the middle of the Tang dynasty.Moreover,the basic texts of Cantong qi used by Yin Chansheng and Rong have obvious differences.This is not only embodied in the differences between annotation versions and basic texts,but also in the differences between the quotation of Cantong qi and its various quotation verisons.It can be confirmed that Yin's version,Rong's version and Peng Xiao's version with Zhu Xi's version-which become mainstream in later generations,belong to two separate text systems.Therefore,Yin Changsheng's annotation and Rong's annotation are likely an early commentary edition of the book.Before the Southern Song dynasty,text systems represented by Yin and Rong texts dominated;after the Southern Song dynasty,text systems represented by Peng Xiao and Zhu Xi got an absolute advantage,while the influence of the systems of Yin and Rong de

关 键 词：《周易参同契》 阴注 容注 彭注 朱注 

分 类 号：B234.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]