双重绩效反馈如何影响环保绩效:棘轮效应、逆向避责、现状偏好和蜕皮效应  

How Does Dual Performance Feedback Affect Improvement of Environmental Protection Performance at Countylevel?

作　　者：祁凡骅[1] 高天翼 李正午 Qi Fanhua;Gao Tianyi;Li Zhengwu(School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2024年第6期121-135,共15页Chinese Public Administration

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“乡村振兴视域下村党组织书记胜任能力数字测评研究”(编号:22AGL023)。

摘　　要：绩效反馈会影响公共部门决策,但是双重绩效反馈如何影响公共部门决策仍有待探索。本研究聚焦基层生态环境治理,采用县(区)月度环保绩效数据,运用多元断点回归方法检验冲突与一致的双重绩效反馈对环保绩效提升的影响以及长期战略规划在其中的调节作用。研究发现,一致正向绩效反馈会显著提高绩效改进的幅度,一致负向绩效反馈对绩效改进没有显著影响,同时接受正向社会绩效反馈和负向历史绩效反馈会显著降低绩效改进的幅度,同时接受负向社会绩效反馈和正向历史绩效反馈会显著提高绩效改进的幅度。此外,长期战略规划会调节双重绩效反馈对绩效改进的影响。由此,本文进一步提出了一些改进环境治理的思考和建议。Performance feedback can influence decision-making in the public sector,but how dual performance feedback affects public sector decision-making remains to be explored.This study focuses on grassroots ecological environment governance,utilizing monthly environmental protection performance data at the county level,and employing a multi-score regression discontinuity design to test the effects of conflicting and consistent dual performance feedback on environmental performance improvement,as well as the moderating role of long-term strategic planning.The findings indicate that consistent positive performance feedback significantly enhances the degree of performance improvement,whereas consistent negative performance feedback does not have a significant impact on performance improvement.Concurrently receiving both positive social performance feedback and negative historical performance feedback.

关 键 词：绩效反馈 基层治理 环境治理 战略规划 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]