回归混杂性:重审柄谷行人风景论中言文一致问题  

Returning to Hybridity:Reexamining the Consistency between Language and Writing in Kojin Karatani’s Landscape Theory

作　　者：汤拥华[1] Tang Yonghua

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系,上海200241

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第4期56-68,179,共14页Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）

摘　　要：柄谷行人以言文一致问题为枢纽展开有关“风景的发现”的论说,为风景批评开辟了新的理论空间。可以在以下几个层面接着柄谷行人讲:首先,借助柄谷行人有关透明性的论说,打开风景批评的语言论向度,同时评估这一论说所承载的现代性叙事的多重困境;其次,依循柄谷行人对“外部性”的建构,探讨从内部语言学向“他者语言学”转换的可能性及其对于风景批评的价值;最后,以语言之偶然性和混杂性为立足点,审视柄谷行人风景论的伦理诉求,重新描述风景书写的文体特征和风景美学的话语逻辑。Kojin Karatani’s theory of the“discovery of landscape”revolves around the consistency between language and writing,opening up a new theoretical space for landscape criticism.We can develop Karatani’s theory from the following aspects.Firstly,we can open up the linguistic dimension of landscape criticism by leveraging Karatani’s discourse of transparency,and evaluate the multiple dilemmas of modernity narrative carried by this discourse.Secondly,following Karatani’s construction of“externalities”,we can explore the possibility of transforming from internal linguistics to“linguistics of otherness”and the value of such transformation for landscape criticism.Finally,based on the contingency and hybridity of language,we can examine the ethical demands in Karatani’s landscape theory,redescribing the stylistic features of landscape writing and the discourse logic of landscape aesthetics.

关 键 词：风景 柄谷行人 言文一致 透明性 混杂性 

分 类 号：I313.06[文学—其他各国文学]