检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任光启 Ren Guangqi
机构地区:[1]四川大学历史文化学院
出 处:《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期171-180,208,共11页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:在瓦萨里创作的《名人传》的两个版本和孔迪维的《米开朗基罗传》中,米开朗基罗被塑造成个性突出、敢于对抗赞助人的英雄形象,并且被用来证明文艺复兴时期艺术家群体的社会地位取得重大提升。事实上,这种观点是出于对米开朗基罗的误解,夸大了精英艺术家的独立性和艺术家群体社会地位提高的程度,是传记作家刻意塑造的结果。围绕米开朗基罗为朱利乌斯二世制作陵墓雕塑相关传记书写分析与历史考察,其意义不仅在于认清传记作家对米开朗基罗形象的夸大和刻意塑造,还在于准确认识艺术家地位的提升,并给予艺术家与赞助人关系以准确定位。In the two versions of Vasari’s Lives by Vasari and Condivi’s The Life of Michelangelo , Michelangelo is depicted as a prominent and heroic figure who dares to confront his sponsors, used to demonstrate the significant elevation of the social status of artists during the Renaissance. In fact, this viewpoint is based on a misunderstanding of Michelangelo, exaggerating the independence of elite artists and the extent to which the social status of the artist community has improved, which is the deliberate result of the biographers’ shaping. The analysis of the writing and historical investigation of the biography of Michelangelo’s tomb sculptures for Julius II helps to recognize the exaggeration and deliberate shaping of Michelangelo’s image by biographers, to gain a precise understanding of the elevation of the artist’s status and to provide a correct positioning of the relationship between artists and sponsors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.68.255