检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王伟[1] Wang Wei
机构地区:[1]西安外国语大学商学院
出 处:《外语教学》2024年第4期46-52,共7页Foreign Language Education
基 金:西安外国语大学重大课题攻关项目“批评语类视域下的企业社会责任报告话语研究”(项目编号:17XWZD04);西安外国语大学重点项目“应用语言学多维跨域科研创新团队”(项目编号:22XWF01)的阶段性研究成果,并受到陕西高校青年创新团队的支持。
摘 要:本文通过考察英语TED演讲语篇的词块特征,探讨新媒体语境下科普话语的亲近性构建,进而揭示其科学传播模式。目标词块结合语境的分析发现,TED呈现出投入亲近和成员亲近的矛盾统一,既不属于缺失模式,也不是民主模式,更接近对话模式。研究反映了科普话语重构科学知识的同时致力于拉近与受众的距离,以推进科普的民主进程,但同时彰显专家身份,伴有推销目的的渗入。本文将词块研究拓展到口语语篇,进一步验证了词块是话语的重要构筑砌块,在研究路径上实现了从话语策略到社会意义的跨越,深化了对科普话语人际意义的理解。This study explores the extent to which phraseological configurations in TED talks encode proximity,thus demystifying the popularization model TED talks take.The analysis reveals the dilemma which involves seesawing between proximity of commitment and proximity of membership.The findings trigger reflections on the model of popularization:neither deficit nor democratic,but a dialogue model is identified as more suited to delimit the TED talk genre.Other than merely communicating the lay version of knowledge,TED talks are devoted to both a democratic means of communication with mitigated speaker-audience asymmetry and also to a promotional agenda not dissimilar to that of advertising.This study extends applied lexical bundle research to non-academic spoken genres,confirming the status of lexical bundles as building blocks of discourse.Though language-centered,this study has an overt sociological intent to contribute insights into the interpersonality in popularization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.152.124