帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪司法适用误区及匡正  

Misunderstandings and Rectification of Judicial Application in the Crime of Assisting Information Network Crimes

作　　者：单佳 梁腾腾 Shan Jia;Liang Tengteng

机构地区：[1]鲁东大学盈科法学院,山东烟台264025 [2]山东省烟台市福山区人民检察院,山东烟台265500

出　　处：《南海法学》2024年第3期43-54,共12页The South China Sea Law Journal

摘　　要：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的设立具有积极作用。然而该罪的司法适用存在对“主观明知”的判定随意,不能正确理解帮信罪中“犯罪”一词的含义,对“情节严重”的说理不充分,与相关罪名特别是掩饰、隐瞒犯罪活动罪的竞合问题突出等困境。为匡正适用误区,应在“包含说”基础上进一步界定“明知”的认定标准,确定被帮助者的“犯罪”行为只需符合客观构成要件标准,基于限缩目的细化司法解释、及时公布指导性案例和通过强制说理明确“情节严重”的标准,坚持帮信罪和掩隐罪应当排他适用并应继续坚持主客观相统一的认定标准等,以促进本罪在实践中的正确适用,推动相关网络犯罪的治理。The establishment of the crime of assisting information network criminal activities has a positive role.However,the judicial application of this crime has such difficulties as arbitrary judgment of subjective"knowing",failure to correctly understand the meaning of the word"crime"in the crime of assisting information network criminal activities,insufficient reasoning of"serious circumstances",and prominent concurrence with relevant crimes,especially the crime of concealing criminal activities.In order to correct the erroneous areas of application,we should further define the criteria for knowing on the basis of the"inclusion theory",determine that the"criminal"acts of the assisted only meet the criteria for objective constituent elements,refine judicial interpretations based on the purpose of limitation,publish guiding cases in time and clarify the criteria for"serious circumstances"through compulsory reasoning,and adhere to the criteria for determining that the crime of helping others and the crime of concealing others should be applied exclusively and should continue to adhere to the unity of subjective and objective viewpoints,so as to promote the correct application of this crime in practice and promote the governance of relevant network crimes.

关 键 词：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 明知 情节严重 主客观相统一 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]